Search Results (1 to 10 of 69 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 15 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 12 JMIR Research Protocols
- 7 JMIR Formative Research
- 6 JMIR Medical Education
- 6 JMIR Serious Games
- 4 JMIR Dermatology
- 4 JMIR Mental Health
- 4 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 3 JMIR Human Factors
- 2 JMIR Cardio
- 2 JMIR Infodemiology
- 1 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 1 JMIR Cancer
- 1 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 JMIRx Med
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Evolution of Learning Styles in Surgery Comparing Residents and Teachers: Cross-Sectional Study
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e64767
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Mapping the Evidence on Compassion Skills in Applied Behavior Analysis: Protocol for Scoping Review
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e66399
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The higher the coefficient, the stronger the test-retest reliability [13]. κ values between 0.41 and 0.6 were considered to be of moderate reliability, between 0.61 and 0.8 as substantial reliability and between 0.81 and 1 very high reliability [19]. κ is influenced by the trait prevalence and basal rates. κ may be low even though there are high levels of agreement and even though individual ratings are accurate, thus we have also calculated the proportion of observed and expected agreement only by chance.
Interact J Med Res 2025;14:e64720
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
To account for the interrater chance of agreement, the modified κ statistic, based on the content validity index, was calculated [62]. This involved first computing the probability of chance agreement using the formula for a binomial random variable. The modified κ statistic was then derived using the proportion of agreements on relevance and the calculated probability of chance agreement [62]. Results were interpreted based on recommendations from the literature regarding the number of experts.
JMIR Serious Games 2025;13:e66167
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section