Search Results (1 to 10 of 56 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 17 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 11 JMIR Mental Health
- 10 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 6 JMIR Formative Research
- 4 JMIR Research Protocols
- 2 JMIR Human Factors
- 2 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 2 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Correction: Quality Assessment of Digital Health Apps: Umbrella Review
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e67849
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Quality Assessment of Digital Health Apps: Umbrella Review
This review examined 97 evaluation frameworks and studies that included general digital health app evaluation frameworks, such as the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS), and more domain-specific frameworks, such as the SUS and Software Usability Measurement Inventory (SUMI).
The scoring and rating techniques varied within the different frameworks, that is, 23% of frameworks used a 5-point scale, 6% a 3-point scale, 3% a 7-point scale, 2% a 4-point scale, and 1% a 10-point scale.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e58616
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section