Search Results (1 to 10 of 528 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 156 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 100 JMIR Research Protocols
- 72 JMIR Formative Research
- 29 JMIR Mental Health
- 28 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 21 JMIR Human Factors
- 20 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 16 JMIR Medical Education
- 14 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 12 JMIR Cancer
- 9 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 8 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 6 JMIR Dermatology
- 6 JMIR Infodemiology
- 5 JMIR Cardio
- 5 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 5 JMIR Serious Games
- 4 JMIR Diabetes
- 3 JMIR Aging
- 2 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 2 JMIR AI
- 2 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 1 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIRx Med
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research [19], which consists of 10 statements addressing the possibility of bias in study design, conduct, and analysis (Multimedia Appendix 3 [20-32]). Two authors (HM-M and JM-A) independently applied the checklist, and disagreements were resolved by consensus.
Two independent reviewers (HM-M and BS-R-H) extracted data using a standardized form.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71186
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Titles and abstracts are being screened based on the research question, developed using the Person-Content-Context-Method framework of the Joanna Briggs Institute [38]. The review process follows the framework outlined by Levac et al [39]. Two researchers (WS and SP) independently screened and selected titles and abstracts. Full-text versions of potentially relevant articles were obtained, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e65682
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Implementing the H&P 360 in Three Medical Institutions: Usability Study
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e66221
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS