Search Results (1 to 10 of 2815 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 734 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 557 JMIR Research Protocols
- 331 JMIR Formative Research
- 211 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 144 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 106 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 105 JMIR Mental Health
- 72 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 69 JMIR Human Factors
- 58 JMIR Cancer
- 50 JMIR Aging
- 46 JMIR Dermatology
- 46 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 37 JMIR Serious Games
- 33 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 32 JMIR Medical Education
- 26 Iproceedings
- 26 JMIR Cardio
- 26 JMIR Diabetes
- 22 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 18 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 14 JMIRx Med
- 13 JMIR Infodemiology
- 12 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 10 JMIR AI
- 7 JMIR Nursing
- 5 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 2 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 2 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

The learning styles of e-learning tools can be visual, auditory, or audio-visual [39,40]. Furthermore, e-learning tools have either a receptive or a performative learning goal [40]. In addition, e-learning tools may vary in content. Consequently, there are various possibilities to classify e-learning tools. This study focusses on the following e-learning structures: formats, content areas, learning styles, and learning goals.
Why is it essential to gain insight into the nature of AAC e-learning tools?
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e63392
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

For compensation, participants were either entered into a draw for 10 Aus $100 (US $65) e-gift cards (cohort 1) or received an Aus $50 (US $33) e-gift card (cohort 2).
Three unique identifiers were randomly assigned to each participant: one upon receipt of the study invitation; one during screening; and one upon confirmation of eligibility. These identifiers enabled linkage between baseline and digital phenotyping data for participants from AGDS.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e71377
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section