Search Results (1 to 10 of 799 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 198 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 123 JMIR Research Protocols
- 106 JMIR Formative Research
- 71 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 40 JMIR Mental Health
- 32 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 32 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 30 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 19 JMIR Cancer
- 17 JMIR Dermatology
- 15 JMIR Medical Education
- 14 JMIR Human Factors
- 14 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 13 JMIR Aging
- 12 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 10 Iproceedings
- 10 JMIR Cardio
- 9 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 7 JMIR Nursing
- 6 JMIR Infodemiology
- 4 JMIR Serious Games
- 3 JMIR AI
- 3 JMIR Diabetes
- 3 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 3 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 1 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
All reviewers completed a week-long training on systematic reviews to ensure a consistent understanding of Ro B2. Three reviewers (WZ, DX, and CB) initially conducted independent judgments of 46 RCTs using standardized criteria, recording the time taken for the judgments. All results were resolved through consensus. We randomly selected 3 evaluation results from each category to construct the prompt, which were used as benchmarks to assess the accuracy of the answers generated by the LLMs.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e70450
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Clinical Nurse Educators’ Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions: Protocol for a Scoping Review
Studies that include the long-term setting and nonclinical areas will be excluded.
This review will consider all studies, published between January 2013 and August 2024, which use a range of research methodologies, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods study designs. Gray literature, reviews, editorial pieces, and opinion papers will also be evaluated for potential inclusion.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e66712
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Primary Care: Multidisciplinary Pilot Implementation Study
Future studies could evaluate whether the conversion of patients to personal CGM will facilitate the long-term use of CGM technology.
CGM is a powerful tool in modern diabetes management, yet access to endocrinologists with specialized training in use of this technology is curtailed by the limited supply of endocrinologists [18]. PCPs, who see most patients with type 2 diabetes [19], are similarly oversaturated and may lack expertise in CGM interpretation [20].
JMIR Diabetes 2025;10:e69061
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Impact Factor Trends of Top Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals During COVID-19
Interact J Med Res 2025;14:e70554
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Reference 46: Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67506
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Here, both the persistent clinical effect at 1-month follow-up and the significant improvement in the impact of anxiety on participants’ day-to-day functioning (as measured with the WSAS) highlight the potential of the digital program to instigate long-lasting behavioral change. Retrospective analysis of recurrence data from electronic health records is needed to accurately measure the persistence of the clinical effect in the real world over a longer follow-up period.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e69351
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Cocreating the Visualization of Digital Mobility Outcomes: Delphi-Type Process With Patients
An open-ended questionnaire was used in round 1 to understand what aspects of mobility were most influenced by their long-term health condition (Multimedia Appendix 1). Questions were based on existing literature relating to how people with long-term health conditions experience mobility, specifically how it impacts them physically, socially, and psychologically [3].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e68782
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS