Search Results (1 to 10 of 3549 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 1096 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 503 JMIR Research Protocols
- 343 JMIR Formative Research
- 309 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 258 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 179 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 137 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 86 JMIR Mental Health
- 80 JMIR Serious Games
- 76 JMIR Human Factors
- 67 JMIR Cancer
- 55 JMIR Aging
- 46 JMIR Dermatology
- 45 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 37 JMIR Medical Education
- 36 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 29 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 26 JMIR Cardio
- 23 JMIR Diabetes
- 21 Iproceedings
- 19 JMIR Infodemiology
- 18 JMIR AI
- 15 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 14 JMIRx Med
- 13 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 9 JMIR Nursing
- 4 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
While previous studies have examined the utility of mobile apps, social media, e-consenting tools, blockchain technology, web-based programs, and online messaging to improve clinical trial enrollment, few have specifically addressed the unique barriers faced by the young adult population. Yet, digital modalities have grown in popularity among this population for many indications including disease interventions and browsing emerging health information [13-15].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e70852
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
different percentages of outcome predictions, cutoff points were 0.851 for identifying the top 1% of patients (2 predictive positive cases, point A — high-risk threshold),0.500 for the top 3.5% (7 predictive positive cases, point B — default threshold), 0.495 for the top 4% (8 predictive positive cases, point C — optimal threshold based on the maximum F1-score), 0.272 for the top 8% (16 predictive positive cases, point D — equal threshold), and 0.071 for the top 26% of patients (51 predictive positive cases, point E
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67767
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
After obtaining informed consent, supported by the REDCap e-Consent Framework feature, participants will be automatically directed to baseline questionnaire surveys, for which REDCap auto-calculates the scores. Following completion of the baseline assessment, the participant will be randomized to their respective treatment conduction using the Randomization Module.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e65770
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Reference 46: Patient-centered design of an e-mental health appDigital Mental Health Interventions, e-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e65889
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS