Search Results (1 to 10 of 2379 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 619 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 462 JMIR Research Protocols
- 260 JMIR Formative Research
- 159 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 138 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 87 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 83 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 79 JMIR Mental Health
- 64 JMIR Human Factors
- 54 JMIR Cancer
- 39 JMIR Serious Games
- 37 JMIR Aging
- 37 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 34 Iproceedings
- 32 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 29 JMIR Medical Education
- 28 JMIR Diabetes
- 23 JMIR Cardio
- 23 JMIR Dermatology
- 23 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 14 JMIRx Med
- 12 JMIR AI
- 10 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 9 JMIR Infodemiology
- 7 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 6 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 4 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 2 JMIR Nursing
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)

Novo Nordisk (NVO) struggling to meet demand(https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-02-21/novo-s-ozempic-wegovy-shortage-ends-threatening-copycats
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e73619
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

growing share, distinctive profile(https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2011/12/22/women-in-the-u-s-military-growing-share-distinctive-profile
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e73223
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

by the young(https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/04/20/rise-in-english-proficiency-among-u-s-hispanics-is-driven-by-the-young
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e69540
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

For example, Katz et al [28] reported that GPT-4’s accuracy rates ranged from 17.42% (n=21) to 74.7% (n=90) across various medical disciplines. In contrast, our study found GPT-4’s accuracy rates ranged more narrowly, from 53.5% (n=704) to 60.35% (n=1076). This discrepancy could be partially attributed to the differing medical disciplines emphasized in each study, as well as variations in question structure.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64452
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section