Search Results (1 to 10 of 2100 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 589 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 408 JMIR Research Protocols
- 222 JMIR Formative Research
- 151 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 98 JMIR Mental Health
- 93 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 77 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 69 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 50 JMIR Human Factors
- 43 JMIR Cancer
- 33 JMIR Dermatology
- 32 JMIR Aging
- 31 JMIR Medical Education
- 30 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 23 JMIR Serious Games
- 22 JMIR Cardio
- 20 JMIR Diabetes
- 17 Iproceedings
- 15 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 14 JMIR Infodemiology
- 13 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 9 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 9 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 8 JMIR AI
- 7 JMIRx Med
- 5 JMIR Nursing
- 4 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 3 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 2 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 2 Medicine 2.0
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
A meta-analysis of 119 MI efficacy studies yielded a small but significant effect of MI compared with alternative interventions (d=0.22) [1].
More than 40 studies have investigated the feasibility of conducting motivational interviews delivered partially or completely via computers, mobile phones, robots, voice-activated recordings, and related platforms [4,5]. Many of these studies have used text-based motivational interviews that rely on written interactions between the interviewer and interviewee.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e59085
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Panel (A) shows the Basic Response Time task, (B) shows the spatial span task (forward span trial), (C) shows the Flanker task (congruent condition), (D) shows the continuous performance task (no-go trial), (E) shows the Stroop task (incongruent condition), (F) shows the Boxed task (feature 4 condition), (G) shows the Compass task (neutral condition), (H) shows the Task Switch task (incongruent condition), and (I) shows the Tap and Trace task (dual task condition).
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e60041
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e PROs)
a) Patient Global Health (PGH)
b) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
c) Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC)
Events or incidents
a) Flare
b) Infection
c) Medication problem
d) Other reasons
Adherence
a) Compliance Questionnaire on Rheumatology, CQR
2) Rheumatoid arthritis (e PROs)
Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)
3) Spondyloarthritis (e PROs)
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Axial Spondyloarthritis
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e58095
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Consumer-Grade Neurofeedback With Mindfulness Meditation: Meta-Analysis
For between-participant designs, we primarily calculated Becker’s del for effect sizes, which is the Cohen d for the mb NF group minus the Cohen d for the control group [93]. This provides a simple measure of the degree of differential change between the groups. In cases of incomplete reporting, we converted t tests or partial eta-squared to Cohen d. All effect sizes were converted using Hedges g correction, as many sample sizes were small.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e68204
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section