This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions (2410) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (2871) Mobile Health (mhealth) (2939) Mobile Health in Psychiatry (426) Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine (225) Theme Issue 2022: Reproductive Informatics (52)

Published on in Vol 8 (2024)

This is a member publication of JISC

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/60434, first published .
Intention to Use a Mental Health App for Menopause: Health Belief Model Approach

Intention to Use a Mental Health App for Menopause: Health Belief Model Approach

Intention to Use a Mental Health App for Menopause: Health Belief Model Approach

Authors of this article:

Nayra A Martin-Key1 Author Orcid Image ;   Erin L Funnell1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jiri Benacek1 Author Orcid Image ;   Benedetta Spadaro1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sabine Bahn1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

    Original Paper

    Cambridge Centre for Neuropsychiatric Research, Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    Corresponding Author:

    Sabine Bahn, MD, PhD

    Cambridge Centre for Neuropsychiatric Research

    Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology

    University of Cambridge

    Philippa Fawcett Drive

    Cambridge, CB3 0AS

    United Kingdom

    Phone: 44 1223 334151

    Email: sb209@cam.ac.uk


    Background: Menopause presents a period of heightened vulnerability for mental health issues. Despite this, mental health screening is not consistently integrated into menopausal health care, and access to psychological interventions is limited. Digital technologies, such as web and smartphone apps, may offer a way to facilitate and improve mental health care provision throughout menopause. However, little is known about potential users’ intention to use such technologies during this critical phase of life.

    Objective: To examine the factors that impact the intention of potential users to use a mental health app during menopause, we used the Health Belief Model (HBM), a psychological framework widely used to understand and predict individuals’ health-related behaviors.

    Methods: An online survey was generated. Convenience sampling was used, with participants recruited via social media and email, through relevant foundations and support groups, and by word of mouth. Structural equation modeling with maximum likelihood estimation was conducted to explore whether the factor structure of the HBM is a good fit for predicting the intention to use a mental health app for menopause. A Cronbach α value of .05 was used for determining statistical significance.

    Results: A total of 1154 participants commenced the survey, of which 82.49% (n=952) completed at least 97% of the survey. Of these, 86.76% (n=826) expressed that their menopausal symptoms had negatively affected their mental health, and went on to answer questions regarding their experiences and interest in using a web or smartphone app for mental health symptoms related to menopause. Data from this subgroup (N=826) were analyzed. In total, 74.09% (n=612) of respondents sought online help for mental health symptoms related to menopause. The most common topics searched for were symptom characteristics (n=435, 52.66%) and treatment or therapy options (n=210, 25.42%). Psychoeducation (n=514, 62.23%) was the most desired mental health app feature, followed by symptom tracking (n=499, 60.41%) and self-help tips (n=469, 56.78%). In terms of the intention to use a mental health app, the Satorra-Bentler–scaled fit statistics indicated a good fit for the model (χ2278=790.44, P<.001; comparative fit index=0.933, root mean square error of approximation=0.047, standardized root mean square residual=0.056), with cues to action emerging as the most significant predictor of intention (β=.48, P<.001). This was followed by perceived barriers (β=–.25, P<.001), perceived susceptibility (β=.15, P<.001), and perceived benefits (β=.13, P<.001). Perceived severity (β=.01, P=.869) and self-efficacy (β=.03, P=.286) were not significantly associated with behavioral intention.

    Conclusions: This study reveals important factors that influence the intention to use a mental health app during menopause. It emphasizes the need to address barriers to app usage, while highlighting the impact of credible endorsements and psychoeducation. Furthermore, the study underscores the significance of improving accessibility for users with lower digital literacy or limited resources.

    JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e60434

    doi:10.2196/60434

    Keywords

    menopause; menopause transition; mental health; perimenopause; women’s health; psychological framework; symptom tracking; app usage; app; Health Belief Model 


    Menopause represents a significant milestone in a woman’s life (throughout the study, we refer to a woman as anyone assigned female at birth). It tends to occur naturally between the ages of 44 and 55 years [1], marking the cessation of menstruation due to the decline in ovarian follicular function [2]. Perimenopause, also known as the menopause transition, refers to the phase leading up to menopause and is characterized by a gradual decrease in ovarian function, resulting in less frequent menstrual cycles. This transitional period is estimated to last a median of 4 years [3], signifying an important and transformative stage in a woman’s reproductive journey.

    Every woman’s journey through menopause is unique, but the associated symptoms and the transitional phase can be incredibly challenging. Indeed, the menopause and perimenopause phases are typically associated with physical symptoms (eg, hot flushes, bone and joint pain, loss of libido) that can have a significant impact on an individual’s quality of life [4]. In addition, menopause, and particularly the menopause transition, can increase vulnerability to mental health issues [5], particularly depression and anxiety [6-8], as well as suicidal ideation [9]. Critically, despite several professional bodies recommending psychological interventions as a primary treatment option for menopause-related mental health concerns [10-12], access to these treatments is often limited [13], even in high-income countries, such as the United Kingdom. There is also evidence to suggest that mental health screening is not consistently integrated into menopausal health care in the United Kingdom [14], indicating a missed opportunity to identify and address potential mental health concerns that may arise during this challenging phase of life.

    In this regard, digital technologies, such as web and smartphone apps, may offer a cost-effective and highly scalable way to facilitate and improve mental health care provision in the United Kingdom throughout menopause and the menopause transition. There is evidence to suggest that digital platforms have the potential to enhance the reach, quality, and effectiveness of mental health care services [15], with the use of digital apps for screening and monitoring of mental health symptoms showing promising results across various mental health conditions [16]. Additionally, evidence suggests that individuals are more inclined to disclose severe symptoms on technology platforms than to a health care professional (HCP) [17], and patients appear to value the autonomy and empowerment gained through the use of digital platforms [18]. Recent evidence also suggests that virtual interventions have the potential to improve both physical and psychosocial outcomes of menopausal women [19], but little is known about UK-based perimenopausal and menopausal women’s intention to use digital technologies for mental health concerns that may arise during this critical phase of life.

    To this end, we set out to explore (1) experiences with and preferences toward mental health apps for mental health concerns related to menopause in the United Kingdom and (2) factors that may influence potential users’ intention to use a mental health app throughout menopause and the menopause transition. To achieve the latter, we used the Health Belief Model (HBM [20]), a psychological framework that seeks to explain and predict individuals’ health-related behaviors. The HBM consists of several key components, namely perceived susceptibility (an individual’s perception of their vulnerability or likelihood of experiencing a particular health condition), perceived severity (an individuals’ belief about the seriousness and potential consequences of a health condition), perceived benefits (an individuals’ beliefs in the effectiveness and positive outcomes of adopting a health-related behavior), perceived barriers (an individual’s assessment of obstacles, costs, or negative aspects associated with adopting a health-related behavior), cues to action (triggers that prompt an individual to take action toward a particular health-related behavior), and self-efficacy (an individual’s belief in their ability to successfully perform a specific health-related behavior).

    he HBM has been widely used to understand and promote health behaviors in various contexts, including disease prevention [21], health promotion [22], adherence to medical treatments [23], and health behaviors during menopause [24,25]. The key objective of this study was to understand the health belief constructs that may influence United Kingdom women’s intention to use a mental health app throughout menopause and the menopause transition. The secondary objective of this study was to explore online help-seeking behaviors and preferences in app features in women with experience of menopause-related mental health concerns in the United Kingdom (UK). The findings from this study have important implications for the development of effective ways to provide digital mental health care solutions throughout this complex time.


    Overview

    This study used data from a UK-wide anonymous online survey study conducted by the Cambridge Centre for Neuropsychiatric Research between January and March 2023 [14]. The key objectives of the study were to (1) understand the current state of care provision offered via health care services in the United Kingdom throughout menopause and the menopause transition and (2) explore the use of and interest in digital technologies for mental health throughout menopause and the menopause transition. To this end, an anonymous online survey was created using Qualtrics XM. The survey could be completed in 15-20 minutes and comprised 5 sections: (1) sociodemographic information, (2) health care provision throughout menopause, (3) mental health symptoms and care provision throughout menopause, (4) menopause-specific quality-of-life symptoms, and (5) experiences and interest in using a web or smartphone app for mental health symptoms related to menopause.

    The latter section also included 26 items pertaining to HBM constructs (see Table 1 for a description of the constructs and list of items in the study). Items were developed based on previous research [26,27] and in consultation with a practicing psychiatrist (author SB) and a patient and public involvement (PPI) panel of members with lived experience of mental health concerns. Items were rated on a 6-point Likert-scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). For the purpose of this study, only data from sections 1 and 5 were included. The survey was adaptive in nature, meaning that only relevant questions were asked based on responses to previous questions.

    Table 1. HBMa constructs (ie, perceived benefits, perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived barriers, cues to action, self-efficacy, behavioral intention), their descriptions, and respective 26 items used in the study.
    HBM constructDescriptionItems
    Perceived benefitsThe perceived benefits associated with using a mental health app for mental health symptoms related to menopause
    • A better understanding of my mental health symptoms would prevent problems with friends and family.
    • A burden would be lifted off me if I better understood my mental health symptoms.
    • A better understanding of my mental health symptoms would encourage me to seek professional help.
    Perceived severityThe perceived severity of mental health symptoms related to menopause
    • My mental health symptoms are serious.
    • My mental health symptoms have negative consequences on my life.
    • My mental health symptoms cause difficulties for those who are close to me.
    Perceived susceptibilityThe perceived likelihood or vulnerability of experiencing mental health symptoms related to menopause (eg, low mood)
    • My family history puts me at risk for mental health disorders.
    • My lifestyle puts me at risk for mental health disorders.
    • The amount of stress in my life puts me at risk for mental health disorders.
    • Menopause puts me at risk for mental health disorders.
    Perceived barriersThe perceived obstacles associated with using a mental health app for mental health symptoms related to menopause
    • I am not comfortable getting my symptoms assessed by a mental health app.
    • I think knowing the results of my mental health assessment would be too distressing.
    • I think that a mental health app would not be able to understand my symptoms.
    • I worry about the mental health app keeping my data confidential.
    • I worry about the potential costs related to the app and seeking mental health support.
    Cues to actionA prompt that would encourage use of a mental health app for mental health symptoms related to menopause
    • I would use the mental health app if it were developed and validated by psychiatrists.
    • I would use the mental health app if it were developed by a reputable university.
    • I would use the mental health app if an HCPb (eg, my GPc) or the NHSd recommended it.
    • I would use the mental health app if a friend or family member recommended it.
    • I would use the mental health app if it were advertised on social media (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, etc).
    Self-efficacyA belief in possessing the necessary resources and skills to use a mental health app for mental health symptoms related to menopause
    • I know how to download an app or access a website.
    • I have the necessary resources to use a mental health website or app (eg, computer, smartphone, internet connection).
    • I can get help from others (eg, family, or others) if I am having difficulties using an app or website.
    Behavioral intentionThe intention to use a mental health app for mental health symptoms related to menopause
    • I would be willing to try the mental health app.
    • I plan to try the mental health app once it becomes available.
    • I want to use the mental health app in the future.

    aHBM: Health Belief Model.

    bHCP: health care professional.

    cGP: general practitioner.

    dNHS: National Health Service.

    Participants

    Convenience sampling was used, with participants recruited between January and March 2023 via email, paid Facebook and Instagram advertisements, organic posts on the Cambridge Centre for Neuropsychiatric Research Facebook and X (formerly known as Twitter) pages, and Reddit. Recruitment messages were also disseminated by word of mouth and through relevant foundations and support groups. Inclusion criteria for the study were as follows: (1) age≥18 years, (2) UK residence, and (3) must be currently experiencing symptoms of menopause or the menopause transition (eg, hot flushes, mood changes, night sweats, irregular or absent periods, decreased sex drive). Participants were also required to not be currently pregnant or breastfeeding and not have been diagnosed with a mental health condition in order to take part in the study. Participants of any gender (ie, female, male, nonbinary, other, those preferring not to answer) could take part in the study, provided that they met the inclusion criteria (note that we used the term “women” to refer to all participants in the study).

    Menopause status was based on the definitions put forth by the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN [28]). Those in the menopause transition included individuals who self-reported being in the early or late perimenopause stages (ie, those experiencing significant changes in their menstrual cycles not due to pregnancy, breastfeeding, stress, or a medical condition or who had not had menstrual bleeding for 3-11 months not due to pregnancy, breastfeeding, stress, or a medical condition). Those in menopause had undergone 12 months without menstrual bleeding not due to pregnancy, breastfeeding, or stress, as well as those who had undergone medically induced menopause.

    Participants were invited to enter their email for the chance to win 1 of 3 GB £50 (US $67) Highstreet vouchers. Participants were able to withdraw from the study at any point.

    Data Analysis

    Descriptive statistics were conducted in IBM SPSS version 28.0.1.1. Figures were created using Microsoft Excel version 2206 and Microsoft PowerPoint version 2206 (Microsoft Office 365). HBM data were analyzed in Stata version 17.0 (StataCorp) [29]. Mean scores per HMB construct were obtained by summing the corresponding HBM constructs and dividing the sum by the number of items. Structural equation modeling (SEM) with maximum likelihood estimation was conducted to explore whether the factor structure of the HBM is a good fit for predicting the intention to use a digital mental health app for mental health–related symptoms that can arise as a result of menopause or the menopause transition. All exogenous latent variables were assumed to be correlated. The Satorra-Bentler–scaled χ2 test for model goodness-of-fit evaluation was reported as data were nonnormally distributed (assessed using the Doornik-Hansen test). Although χ2 is commonly reported to evaluate fit, and a good model should present with a P value above the 0.05 threshold [30], it is sensitive to sample size. As such, it is not necessarily a reliable basis for the acceptance or rejection of a model [31-33]. For this reason, we also evaluated the model fit using the comparative fit index (CFI), the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), as is the recommendation [34]. A good model fit for the purposes of the study satisfied a CFI value of 0.90, an RMSEA below 0.60, and an SRMS of less than 0.08 [35]. A Cronbach α value of 0.05 was used for determining statistical significance.

    Ethical Considerations

    The study was approved by the University of Cambridge Human Psychology Research Ethics Committee (approval number PRE.2022.110). All participants provided informed consent electronically to participate in the study.


    Sociodemographic Characteristics

    Participants’ sociodemographic information across the entire sample can be found in Table 2. A total of 1154 participants commenced the survey, of which 82.49% (n=952) completed at least 97% of the survey (this completion rate ensured no missing data for the analysis of interest). Of these, 86.76% (n=826) expressed that their menopausal symptoms had negatively affected their mental health, and went on to answer questions in section 5 (ie, experiences and interest in using a web or smartphone app for mental health symptoms related to menopause). Data from this subgroup (N=826) were analyzed. The average age was 50.28 (SD 5.08) years, with the majority of respondents self-identifying as female (n=811, 98.18%), being White (n=803, 97.22%), having at least an undergraduate degree (n=501, 60.65%), and being married or in a civil partnership (n=518, 62.71%). Regarding accommodation characteristics, living with a partner and children (n=375, 45.39%) and living with a partner (n=281, 34.02%) were the most common arrangements. In addition, 85.47% (n=706) were employed, and 61.14% (n=505) had a household income of at least GB £35,001 (US $46,787) before tax.

    Table 2. Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample surveyed in the study (N=826).
    CharacteristicsValue
    Age (years), mean (SD)50.28 (5.08)
    Gender identity, n (%)

    		Female811 (98.18)

    		Male1 (0.12)

    		Nonbinary5 (0.61)

    		Other7 (0.85)

    		Prefer not to answer2 (0.24)
    Ethnicity, n (%)

    		White803 (97.22)

    		Asian/Asian British4 (0.48)

    		Black/African/Caribbean/Black British1 (0.12)

    		Mixed/multiple ethnic groups16 (1.94)

    		Arab2 (0.24)
    Education, n (%)

    		Below GCSEa/equivalent17 (2.06)

    		GCSE/equivalent122 (14.77)

    		A levelb/IBc/advanced higher169 (20.46)

    		Undergraduate degree244 (29.54)

    		Postgraduate degree257 (31.11)

    		Other14 (1.69)

    		Prefer not to answer3 (0.36)
    Relationship status, n (%)

    		Single88 (10.65)

    		Married/civil partnership518 (62.71)

    		Cohabiting134 (16.22)

    		Separated15 (1.82)

    		Divorced51 (6.17)

    		Other19 (2.30)

    		Prefer not to answer1 (0.12)
    Living arrangement, n (%)

    		Living alone87 (10.53)

    		Living in shared accommodation with previously unknown individual(s)1 (0.12)

    		Living with relative(s), including single parent82 (9.93)

    		Living with a partner281 (34.02)

    		Living with a partner and children375 (45.40)
    Employmentd, n (%)

    		Full-time employment394 (47.70)

    		Part-time employment220 (26.63)

    		Self-employment92 (11.14)

    		Parental leave/care for a family member30 (3.63)

    		Student15 (1.82)

    		Voluntary work15 (1.82)

    		Retired35 (4.24)

    		Unemployed57 (6.90)

    		Prefer not to answer13 (1.57)
    Household income (GB £)e, n (%)

    		<15,000 (US $20,051)61 (7.38)

    		15,001-25,000 (US $20,052-$33,418)60 (7.26)

    		25,001-35,000 (US $33,420-$46,786)100 (12.11)

    		35,001-45,000 (US $46,787-$60,153)85 (10.29)

    		45,001-55,000 (US $60,154-$73,520)94 (11.38)

    		55,001-65,000 (US $73,522-$86,888)75 (9.08)

    		65,001-75,000 (US $86,889-$100,255)79 (9.56)

    		75,001-85,000 (US $100,256-$113,622)54 (6.54)

    		>85,001 (US $113,624)118 (14.29)

    		Prefer not to answer100 (12.11)

    aA level: advanced-level qualification.

    bGCSE: General Certificate of Secondary Education.

    cIB: International Baccalaureate.

    dPercentages may add to more than 100 as participants could select multiple options.

    eAn exchange rate of 1 GB £=US $1.34 was applied.

    Experiences and Interest in Using Digital Technology for Mental Health Symptoms Related to Menopause

    A summary of respondents’ experiences and interest in using digital technology for mental health symptoms related to the menopause can be found in Figure 1. In total, 74.09% (n=612) of respondents had sought help online regarding mental health symptoms related to menopause (Figure 1A), with the help most commonly searched for including looking for information about symptom characteristics (n=435, 52.66%) and treatment or therapy options (n=210, 25.42%), as shown in Figure 1B. When respondents were asked to select features for their ideal mental health app, the most sought for feature was psychoeducation (ie, gaining a better understanding of one’s mental health state; n=514, 62.23%), as shown in Figure 1C. This was closely followed by the capability to track symptoms over time (n=499, 60.41%) and self-help tips (n=469, 56.78%), as shown in Figure 1C. When asked about willingness to pay for a mental health assessment app, 63.80% (n=527) of respondents said they would not be willing to pay, while 21.19% (n=175) said they would pay as a one-off service and 15.01% (n=124) as a subscription-based service (Figure 1D).

    ‎
    Figure 1. Respondents’ experiences and interest in using digital technology for mental health symptoms related to menopause (N=826), including (A) sought help online for MH symptoms related to menopause, (B) searched for help online, (C) desired MH app features, and (D) willing to pay for MH app for menopause. aPercentages may add up to more than 100 as respondents could select multiple options. HCP: health care professional; MH: mental health.

    Structural Equation Modeling

    Descriptive statistics for the HBM constructs, including internal consistency scores (overall Cronbach α=.74) can be found in Table 3, with a correlation matrix of the constructs presented in Table 4. The mean behavioral intention score was 4.51 (SD 1.14), indicating an interest in using an app for mental health symptoms related to menopause, and behavioral intention was seen to be significantly correlated to all HBM constructs (all r=0.20-0.66, all P<.01). Perceived barriers were negatively correlated with behavioral intention (r=–0.40, P<.01).

    Table 3. Mean scores and internal consistency scores (ie, Cronbach α) of HBMa constructs in the study (N=826).
    HBM constructMean (SD)Cronbach αb
    Perceived benefits4.12 (1.13)0.80
    Perceived severity3.90 (1.30)0.81
    Perceived susceptibility3.48 (1.08)0.63
    Perceived barriers2.83 (1.00)0.66
    Cues to action4.08 (0.86)0.75
    Self-efficacy5.53 (0.63)0.66
    Behavioral intention4.51 (1.14)0.94

    aHBM: Health Belief Model.

    bHigh reliability, α≥.80; moderate reliability, α=.50-.80; low reliability, α<.50.

    Table 4. Correlation matrix of HBMa constructs in the study (N=826).
    HBM constructPerceived benefitsPerceived severityPerceived susceptibilityPerceived barriersCues to actionSelf-efficacyBehavioral intention
    Perceived benefits—b0.20c0.11c–0.11c0.35c0.050.38c
    Perceived severity——0.45c–0.000.16c0.010.23c
    Perceived susceptibility———0.040.17c0.000.20c
    Perceived barriers————–0.36c–0.18c–0.40c
    Cues to action—————–0.23c0.66c
    Self-efficacy——————0.23c

    aHBM: Health Belief Model.

    bNot applicable.

    cP<.01.

    Results of the Satorra-Bentler–scaled fit statistics indicated a good model fit (χ2278=790.44, P<.001; CFI=0.933, RMSEA=0.047, SRMR=0.056). The model schema and results are presented in Figure 2 (covariates have been removed for readability purposes; see Figure S1 in Multimedia Appendix 1 for the model schema including covariates). All factor loadings between our observed and latent variables were significant and ≥0.36.

    ‎
    Figure 2. SEM schema of HBM constructs predicting the intention to use an app for mental health symptoms related to menopause. ***P<.001; GP: general practitioner; HBM: Health Belief Model; NHS, National Health Service; SEM, structural equation modeling.

    Our analyses revealed that the constructs of perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy explained 58.59% of the variance in behavioral intention. The most important predictor of intention was cues to action (β=.48, P<.001; eg, the app being developed by psychiatrists or a reputable academic institution, the app being recommended by an HCP or the National Health Service [NHS]). This was followed by perceived barriers (β=–.25, P<.001; eg, not feeling comfortable having symptoms assessed by a mental health app, the app not being able to understand mental health symptoms related to menopause), which was negatively associated with behavioral intention. Perceived susceptibility (β=.15, P<.001; eg, lifestyle factors and life stressors increasing one’s vulnerability to mental health symptoms related to menopause) and perceived benefits (β=.13, P<.001; eg, an improved understanding of menopause-related mental health symptoms having the potential to alleviate the burden of mental health symptoms and encourage formal help-seeking behavior) were also significant predictors of behavioral intention. However, perceived severity (β=.01, P=.869; eg, mental health symptoms related to menopause having negative consequences on one’s life) and self-efficacy (β=.03, P=.286; eg, having the necessary resources to use a mental health app) were not significantly associated with behavioral intention.


    Principal Findings

    The key objective of this study was to explore women’s intention to use a mental health app throughout menopause and the menopause transition. The secondary objective of this study was to explore previous online help-seeking behaviors and preferences in features for apps designed for women with experience of menopause-related mental health concerns. Overall, the vast majority of women had turned to online resources for assistance with mental health concerns associated with menopause. The type of help most frequently searched for online included gaining information about symptom characteristics and exploring treatment or therapy options. When asked about their preferred features in a mental health app, psychoeducation, which involves gaining a better understanding of one’s mental health condition, was the most frequently selected feature. This was closely followed by the ability to track symptoms over time and access self-help tips. In regard to the intention to use an app based on the HBM, we found that cues to action was the strongest predictor of women’s intention to adopt the app. This was followed by perceived barriers, perceived susceptibility, and perceived benefits. On the other hand, perceived severity and self-efficacy were not significantly associated with intention to use the app.

    Regarding cues to action, the importance of a mental health app being developed by psychiatrists or a reputable academic institution were recognized as key factors driving cues to action and, in turn, the intention to use the app, supporting previous research [36]. Additionally, receiving active recommendations for an app from HCPs was identified as an excellent strategy to encourage adoption, aligning with previous studies [37]. These findings emphasize the significance of establishing strong collaborations between app developers, reputable organizations (eg, the NHS and academic institutions), and HCPs. Actively involving these partners in the development, promotion, and endorsement of a mental health app is likely to significantly enhance positive attitudes and intentions toward its adoption. Moreover, leveraging the authority and influence of HCPs and health care systems can help address concerns or skepticism regarding the app’s effectiveness, reliability, and suitability for managing mental health symptoms related to menopause.

    Perceived barriers, such as discomfort with an app assessing one’s mental health symptoms and doubts about the app’s ability to understand the complexity of mental health issues, were identified as significant barriers for app usage. Interestingly, evidence indicates that individuals tend to feel more at ease disclosing sensitive health information digitally than to an HCP [17]. However, app developers must be mindful of fostering trust by providing clear and transparent app descriptions and privacy policies to users [38,39], as not doing so can inadvertently create a sense of mistrust. Research also suggests that users feel more comfortable with certain app features, such as appointment reminders, compared to passive data-tracking features, such as GPS and call/text log monitoring [40]. Therefore, app developers need to investigate perceptions of trust of specific app features in their population of interest. Regarding concerns about an app’s ability to understand mental health symptoms, developers should thoroughly assess its effectiveness and feasibility in the intended population [41]. This approach ensures the creation of a high-quality evidence-based assessment and fosters trust among users. Consequently, HCPs can rely on this evidence to confidently suggest or refer to clinically safe and effective technologies.

    Regarding perceived susceptibility, women who believed they were more susceptible to mental health symptoms were more likely to express an intention to use a mental health app. In particular, women who viewed their lifestyle and life stressors as key drivers of poor mental health were more likely to state an interest in using an app. Indeed, there is a well-established correlation between modifiable lifestyle factors and poor mental health during menopause. For instance, having a high BMI and leading a sedentary lifestyle are both linked to increased odds of experiencing mental health issues [42,43]. Additionally, a recent systematic review revealed that stressful life events occurring during menopause, including illness, marital discord, and situations where children leave home or face difficulties in pursuing higher education or finding employment, are linked with increased rates of depression and anxiety during this transitional phase [44]. Considering these findings, app developers may find it beneficial to adopt a holistic approach to mental health care by providing women with tips on maintaining a healthy lifestyle and reducing stress during this challenging phase of life, as the inclusion of such features is likely to be attractive to those most willing to use a mental health app.

    When considering the perceived benefits of using a mental health app, an improved understanding of menopause-related mental health symptoms was found to have the potential to alleviate the burden of mental health symptoms, as well as encourage formal help-seeking behavior. In this regard, increased awareness and discussions about menopause and its associated mental health implications in public health campaigns and the media can facilitate women’s understanding of their vulnerability to these symptoms and, in turn, motivate them to adopt a mental health app as a proactive measure for self-care and mental health symptom management. Notably, research has highlighted that a better understanding and awareness of menopause and its transition allow women to feel more empowered to make better health care decisions during this phase of life [45]. Similarly, providing individuals with information about mental health symptoms and conditions via the means of psychoeducation, for instance, can increase symptom knowledge and has been demonstrated to boost intention to seek help, as well as improve patient engagement and adherence to HCPs’ recommendations [39,46,47]. It is crucial, therefore, for app developers to explore potential collaborations with public health bodies or the media who are delivering menopause education, as well as identify any opportunities to empower individuals with high-quality evidence-based psychoeducation resources that support women’s mental health during menopause and the menopause transition through increased knowledge and signposting to services.

    In this study, both perceived severity and self-efficacy were not significant drivers of app usage. Regarding the former, it is often assumed that individuals who perceive their symptoms as more severe would be more motivated to use a mental health app as a means of managing and addressing their symptoms. However, contrary to this expectation, the study findings did not support a significant relationship between perceived severity and the intention to use a mental health app. Notably, previous studies have reported similar findings, indicating that perceived severity does not significantly predict health-related behaviors in various contexts. For instance, research has shown that perceived severity is not a significant factor in determining behaviors such as facemask use [48], vaccine uptake [49], and adoption of contact-tracing apps [26]. In addition, a qualitative study investigating methods of optimizing smartphone apps for cardiovascular disease did not find perceived severity to be a key driver of app usage [50].

    In terms of self-efficacy, the majority of women in this study expressed confidence in their ability to use a mental health app and had the necessary resources for its use. This confidence can be attributed to the widespread prevalence of smartphones in the United Kingdom, and it is likely that the study sample consisted of individuals with a high level of digital literacy. Although perceived self-efficacy had no influence on the intention to use a mental health app, app developers should focus on strategies that promote sustained app engagement. Improving ease of use and providing in-app guidance have proven effective in increasing app usage [51]. Furthermore, to ensure inclusivity and reach individuals who may benefit from an app but lack the necessary resources, developers should consider incorporating features such as offline functionality or the option to complete a mental health assessment via text messaging. These measures have the potential to enhance accessibility, particularly for hard-to-reach women.

    Limitations

    The participants in this study exhibited characteristics that differed from the general UK population in several ways. They had higher levels of education, a higher household income, and a higher proportion of White individuals. As a result, it is important to acknowledge that the views expressed in this study may not provide a comprehensive representation of the broader UK population. Specifically, the perspectives of ethnic minorities and disadvantaged populations in the United Kingdom, who may face additional barriers or have different attitudes toward using digital solutions for menopause-related concerns, may be underrepresented. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the primary method of participant recruitment for this study was through social media channels. This means that the respondents in this study are more likely to possess high levels of digital literacy skills and may have a greater inclination to use digital tools for health care purposes. Considering these factors is crucial when interpreting the findings of this study and extending them to the wider UK population.

    Of note, although the HBM constructs included in the study were codesigned with a psychiatrist and reviewed by individuals with lived experience of mental health concerns, there is a possibility that some items may not fully capture the experiences of individuals with mental health symptoms related to menopause or that certain important aspects may have been missed. Additionally, since the HBM constructs were developed specifically for this study and have not undergone prior validation, there is a potential for measurement inaccuracies and biases in the findings. As a result, the study’s conclusions should be interpreted with this limitation in mind.

    In addition, it is worth noting that the data were nonnormally distributed, with a high proportion of respondents selecting the lowest and highest response options. Although our analyses accounted for this, this nonnormality may still have implications for the interpretability of our model. For instance, the presence of ceiling and floor effects may have reduced the variability in our data, potentially obscuring more subtle relationships between variables. This could limit the ability of the model to fully capture the complexity of the constructs under investigation.

    Conclusion

    This study sheds light on behavioral drivers influencing the intention to use a mental health app during menopause and the menopause transition. Notably, credible endorsements from reputable sources, addressing perceived barriers, such as concerns about the efficacy of a mental health app, and enhancing mental health literacy through psychoeducation, emerged as significant factors in encouraging app usage. App developers should consider these insights during development and promotion to create apps that can positively impact mental health during this challenging life phase. Additionally, considering features that enhance accessibility for users with lower digital literacy or limited resources will ensure inclusivity and reach a broader audience. By integrating these strategies, app developers can offer valuable support and care to those facing mental health challenges related to menopause and contribute to their overall well-being.

    Acknowledgments

    We are most grateful to all the survey respondents for their participation. This study was funded by the Stanley Medical Research Institute (grant number 07R-1888). The funder played no role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the writing of this manuscript.

    Data Availability

    The data sets used and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

    Authors' Contributions

    NAM-K, ELF, BS, and SB conceived the study focus and materials. ELF coordinated and conducted participant recruitment. NAM-K and JB performed data analysis. NAM-K and ELF prepared the manuscript, with revisions from JB, BS, and SB. All authors contributed to the paper and approved the submitted version.

    Conflicts of Interest

    SB is a director and holds shares in Psyomics Ltd and Psynova Neurotech Ltd but declares no nonfinancial competing interests. ELF is a paid consultant for Psyomics Ltd but declares no nonfinancial competing interests. NAM-K, JB, and BS declare no financial or nonfinancial competing interests.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Model schema of HBM constructs predicting intention to use an app for mental health (including all covariates). HBM: Health Belief Model.

    DOCX File , 582 KB
    1. Hardy C, Hunter M, Griffiths A. Menopause and work: an overview of UK guidance. Occup Med (Lond). Dec 26, 2018;68(9):580-586. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. World Health Report 2008: women, ageing and health: a framework for action. World Health Organization. 2008. URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43810/9789241563529_eng.pdf [accessed 2023-05-10]
    3. Delamater L, Santoro N. Management of the perimenopause. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;61(3):419-432. [CrossRef]
    4. Dave FG, Adedipe T, Disu S, Laiyemo R. Unscheduled bleeding with hormone replacement therapy. Obstetric Gynaecol. Apr 09, 2019;21(2):95-101. [CrossRef]
    5. Soares CN. Depression and menopause: an update on current knowledge and clinical management for this critical window. Med Clin North Am. Jul 2019;103(4):651-667. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Freeman E. Associations of depression with the transition to menopause. Menopause. Jul 2010;17(4):823-827. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Bromberger JT, Kravitz HM, Chang Y, Cyranowski JM, Brown C, Matthews KA. Major depression during and after the menopausal transition: Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Psychol Med. Feb 09, 2011;41(9):1879-1888. [CrossRef]
    8. Hart J. Menopause: shifting hormones linked to anxiety and depression symptoms. Altern Complement Ther. Oct 01, 2019;25(5):254-256. [CrossRef]
    9. Usall J, Pinto-Meza A, Fernández A, de Graaf R, Demyttenaere K, Alonso J, et al. Suicide ideation across reproductive life cycle of women. Results from a European epidemiological study. J Affect Disord. Jul 2009;116(1-2):144-147. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Stute P, Spyropoulou A, Karageorgiou V, Cano A, Bitzer J, Ceausu I, et al. Management of depressive symptoms in peri- and postmenopausal women: EMAS position statement. Maturitas. Jan 2020;131:91-101. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Maki P, Kornstein S, Joffe H. Guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of perimenopausal depression: summary and recommendations. Menopause. 2018;25(10):1069-1085. [CrossRef]
    12. Menopause: diagnosis and management. NICE diagnostic guidance NG23. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2015. URL: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng23 [accessed 2023-06-01]
    13. Fenlon D, Morgan A, Khambaita P, Mistry P, Dunn J, Ah-See M, et al. Management of hot flushes in UK breast cancer patients: clinician and patient perspectives. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. Aug 11, 2017;38(4):276-283. [CrossRef]
    14. Martin-Key NA, Funnell EL, Spadaro B, Bahn S. Perceptions of healthcare provision throughout the menopause in the UK: a mixed-methods study. npj Womens Health. Dec 07, 2023;1(1):1-10. [CrossRef]
    15. Naslund JA, Marsch LA, McHugo GJ, Bartels SJ. Emerging mHealth and eHealth interventions for serious mental illness: a review of the literature. J Ment Health. May 2015;24(5):321-332. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. BinDhim NF, Trevena L. There's an app for that: a guide for healthcare practitioners and researchers on smartphone technology. Online J Public Health Inform. May 31, 2015;7(2):e218. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Torous J, Staples P, Shanahan M, Lin C, Peck P, Keshavan M, et al. Utilizing a personal smartphone custom app to assess the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depressive symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder. JMIR Ment Health. Mar 2015;2(1):e8. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Knowles SE, Toms G, Sanders C, Bee P, Lovell K, Rennick-Egglestone S, et al. Qualitative meta-synthesis of user experience of computerised therapy for depression and anxiety. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84323. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Zou P, D'Souza D, Luo Y, Sun W, Zhang H, Yang Y. Potential effects of virtual interventions for menopause management: a systematic review. Menopause. Aug 9, 2022;29(9):1101-1117. [CrossRef]
    20. Rosenstock IM. The Health Belief Model and preventive health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. Dec 01, 1974;2(4):354-386. [CrossRef]
    21. Panahi R, Siboni FS, Kheiri M, Ghoozlu KJ, Shafaei M, Dehghankar L. Promoting the adoption of behaviors to prevent osteoporosis using the Health Belief Model integrated with health literacy: quasi-experimental intervention study. BMC Public Health. Dec 07, 2021;21(1):2221. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Ersin F, Bahar Z. Effect of health belief model and health promotion model on breast cancer early diagnosis behavior: a systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(10):2555-2562. [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    23. Jones CJ, Smith H, Llewellyn C. Evaluating the effectiveness of health belief model interventions in improving adherence: a systematic review. Health Psychol Rev. Jun 12, 2014;8(3):253-269. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. McGinley AM. Health beliefs and women's use of hormone replacement therapy. Holist Nurs Pract. 2004;18(1):18-25. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Khani Jeihooni A, Mohammadkhah F, Razmjouie F, Harsini PA, Sedghi Jahromi F. Effect of educational intervention based on health belief model on mothers monitoring growth of 6-12 months child with growth disorders. BMC Pediatr. Sep 23, 2022;22(1):561. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Walrave M, Waeterloos C, Ponnet K. Adoption of a contact tracing app for containing COVID-19: a health belief model approach. JMIR Public Health Surveill. Sep 01, 2020;6(3):e20572. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Funnell EL, Spadaro B, Martin-Key NA, Benacek J, Bahn S. Perception of apps for mental health assessment with recommendations for future design: United Kingdom semistructured interview study. JMIR Form Res. Feb 23, 2024;8:e48881. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. El Khoudary SR, Greendale G, Crawford SL, Avis NE, Brooks MM, Thurston RC, et al. The menopause transition and women's health at midlife: a progress report from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Menopause. Oct 2019;26(10):1213-1227. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. College Station, TX. StataCorp LLC; 2021.
    30. Barrett P. Structural equation modelling: adjudging model fit. Pers Individ Differ. May 2007;42(5):815-824. [CrossRef]
    31. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online. 2003;8(2):23-74. [CrossRef]
    32. Vandenberg RJ. Introduction: statistical and methodological myths and urban legends. Org Res Methods. Apr 01, 2006;9(2):194-201. [CrossRef]
    33. Joreskog K, Sorbom D. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. New York. University Press of America; 1993.
    34. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York. Guilford Publications; 2015.
    35. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. Jan 1999;6(1):1-55. [CrossRef]
    36. Borghouts J, Eikey E, Mark G, De Leon C, Schueller SM, Schneider M, et al. Barriers to and facilitators of user engagement with digital mental health interventions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. Mar 24, 2021;23(3):e24387. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Pung A, Fletcher SL, Gunn JM. Mobile app use by primary care patients to manage their depressive symptoms: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. Sep 27, 2018;20(9):e10035. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Robillard JM, Feng TL, Sporn AB, Lai J, Lo C, Ta M, et al. Availability, readability, and content of privacy policies and terms of agreements of mental health apps. Internet Interv. Sep 2019;17:100243. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Schueller SM, Neary M, Lai J, Epstein DA. Understanding people's use of and perspectives on mood-tracking apps: interview study. JMIR Ment Health. Aug 11, 2021;8(8):e29368. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Torous J, Wisniewski H, Liu G, Keshavan M. Mental health mobile phone app usage, concerns, and benefits among psychiatric outpatients: comparative survey study. JMIR Ment Health. Nov 16, 2018;5(4):e11715. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Spadaro B, Martin-Key NA, Bahn S. Building the digital mental health ecosystem: opportunities and challenges for mobile health innovators. J Med Internet Res. Oct 13, 2021;23(10):e27507. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Hoare E, Milton K, Foster C, Allender S. The associations between sedentary behaviour and mental health among adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. Oct 08, 2016;13(1):108. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Rajan T, Menon V. Psychiatric disorders and obesity: a review of association studies. J Postgrad Med. 2017;63(3):182-190. [CrossRef]
    44. Alblooshi S, Taylor M, Gill N. Does menopause elevate the risk for developing depression and anxiety? Results from a systematic review. Australas Psychiatry. Apr 24, 2023;31(2):165-173. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Woods NF, Mitchell ES. The Seattle Midlife Women's Health Study: a longitudinal prospective study of women during the menopausal transition and early postmenopause. Womens Midlife Health. Nov 9, 2016;2(1):6. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Taylor-Rodgers E, Batterham PJ. Evaluation of an online psychoeducation intervention to promote mental health help seeking attitudes and intentions among young adults: randomised controlled trial. J Affect Disord. Oct 15, 2014;168:65-71. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Kravitz RL, Franks P, Feldman MD, Tancredi DJ, Slee CA, Epstein RM, et al. Patient engagement programs for recognition and initial treatment of depression in primary care: a randomized trial. JAMA. Nov 06, 2013;310(17):1818-1828. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Tang CS, Wong C. Factors influencing the wearing of facemasks to prevent the severe acute respiratory syndrome among adult Chinese in Hong Kong. Prev Med. Dec 2004;39(6):1187-1193. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Coe AB, Gatewood SBS, Moczygemba LR, Goode JKR, Beckner JO. The use of the health belief model to assess predictors of intent to receive the novel (2009) H1N1 influenza vaccine. Innov Pharm. 2012;3(2):1-11. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Ceasar JN, Claudel SE, Andrews MR, Tamura K, Mitchell V, Brooks AT, et al. Community engagement in the development of an mHealth-enabled physical activity and cardiovascular health intervention (Step It Up): pilot focus group study. JMIR Form Res. Jan 04, 2019;3(1):e10944. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Fortuna KL, Naslund JA, LaCroix JM, Bianco CL, Brooks JM, Zisman-Ilani Y, et al. Digital peer support mental health interventions for people with a lived experience of a serious mental illness: systematic review. JMIR Ment Health. Apr 03, 2020;7(4):e16460. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    CFI: comparative fit index
    HBM: Health Belief Model
    HCP: health care professional
    NHS: National Health Service
    RMSEA: root mean square error of approximation
    SEM: structural equation modeling
    SRMR: standardized root mean square residual

    Edited by A Mavragani; submitted 13.05.24; peer-reviewed by BC Lim; comments to author 30.08.24; revised version received 30.08.24; accepted 05.09.24; published 16.10.24.

    Copyright

    ©Nayra A Martin-Key, Erin L Funnell, Jiri Benacek, Benedetta Spadaro, Sabine Bahn. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 16.10.2024.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.