Accessibility settings

JMIR Formative Research

Process evaluations, early results, and feasibility/pilot studies of digital and non-digital interventions

Editor-in-Chief:

Amaryllis Mavragani, PhD, Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Canada


Impact Factor 2.1 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 3.5 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Formative Research (JFR, ISSN 2561-326X) publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible papers containing results from process evaluations, feasibility/pilot studies and other kinds of formative research and preliminary results. While the original focus was on the design of medical- and health-related research and technology innovations, JMIR Formative Research publishes studies from all areas of medical and health research.

Formative research is research that occurs before a program is designed and implemented, or while a program is being conducted. Formative research can help

  • define and understand populations in need of an intervention or public health program
  • create programs that are specific to the needs of those populations
  • ensure programs are acceptable and feasible to users before launching
  • improve the relationship between users and agencies/research groups
  • demonstrate the feasibility, use, satisfaction with, or problems with a program before large-scale summative evaluation (looking at health outcomes)

Many funding agencies will expect some sort of pilot/feasibility/process evaluation before funding a larger study such as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Formative research should be an integral part of developing or adapting programs and should be used while the program is ongoing to help refine and improve program activities. Thus, formative evaluation can and should also occur in the form of a process evaluation alongside a summative evaluation such as an RCT.

JMIR Formative Research fills an important gap in the academic journals landscape, as it publishes sound and peer-reviewed formative research that is critical for investigators to apply for further funding, but that is usually not published in outcomes-focused medical journals aiming for impact and generalizability.

Summative evaluations of programs and apps/software that have undergone a thorough formative evaluation before launch have a better chance to be published in high-impact flagship journals; thus, we encourage authors to submit - as a first step - their formative evaluations in JMIR Formative Research (and their evaluation protocols to JMIR Research Protocols). 

JMIR Formative Research is indexed in MEDLINEPubMed, PubMed CentralDOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa/Romeo, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

JMIR Formative Research received a Journal Impact Factor of 2.1 according to the latest release of the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate, 2025.

With a CiteScore of 3.5 (2024) JMIR Formative Research is a Q2 journal in the field of Medicine (miscellaneous), according to Scopus data.

Recent Articles

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Management of contacts to medical communication centers relies heavily on clinical judgment, contextual understanding, and communication skills. Decision support systems, intended to complement medical expertise, may, due to their rigidity, impede effective caller interaction and may, together with the obligatory documentation of calls, contribute to a workflow that draws attention away from the communication. Recommender systems have demonstrated potential in supporting decision-making across various domains by nudging individuals toward better choices without undermining autonomy. We built a prototype that combined artificial intelligence–based question recommendations with structured documentation (hereafter: the prototype) and conducted a feasibility study to test its influence on operators’ performance.

Article Thumbnail
Case Report

The European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) strictly regulates the processing of personal and health-related data, posing challenges for digital health research, especially when data are collected using participants’ own devices. Although scientific data can theoretically be anonymized, standard internet communication protocols inevitably expose transmission metadata, preventing true anonymization. Existing solutions, including virtual private networks, reverse proxies, and trust centers, improve confidentiality but do not technically or legally enable fully anonymized data collection. Consequently, large-scale digital health research often requires extensive organizational measures, complex consent procedures, and high regulatory overhead.

Article Thumbnail
Pilot studies (ehealth)

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women and is the leading cause of cancer death among Latina individuals. Breast cancer survivors are at increased risk of obesity. Mobile health interventions have been shown to be an effective way of reducing the risk of weight gain. Less studied but also important is the extent to which social networks play a role in supporting or undermining weight loss efforts.

Article Thumbnail
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are a major public health concern, contributing to significant individual and societal costs. Despite this, the uptake of evidence-based pharmacologic and behavioral interventions remains limited. The digital delivery of SUD treatment has emerged as a potentially scalable way to reduce access barriers and increase treatment use. Existing digital therapeutic interventions are often created without clinician involvement, evidence-based materials, interdisciplinary input, or content review. The implementation of a structured and methodologically rigorous development process is needed across digital health interventions to help ensure patient-facing materials are validated, understandable, and actionable for the end user.

Article Thumbnail
Pilot studies (non-ehealth)

Society faces multiple challenges, including lifestyle diseases and global climate change. Framing health education within sustainable development may enhance motivation for behavior change because proenvironmental behaviors, as well as healthy behaviors, often rely on the same behavior change principles. Combining these perspectives may therefore reinforce health behaviors and climate-friendly choices.

Article Thumbnail
Research Letter

In a retrospective study of 40 individuals with Parkinson disease, lower visual equilibrium scores (as measured by the sensory organization test, condition 2) were significantly associated with a higher frequency of falls.

Article Thumbnail
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly valuable as a tool and assistant in many areas of clinical and academic medicine. Generative AI (GenAI) creates new content used by large language models, which can generate language that strongly resembles or even improves on that of humans. Learners and educators in many areas of education are using GenAI for essays and assessments, raising issues regarding learning and assessment. GenAI is also raising new concerns in health professions education (HPE), an area of health professions training that sometimes has different aims and assessment methods compared to its clinical counterparts. HPE needs to assess levels of knowledge and understanding of pedagogy, and the use of GenAI presents challenges to its current assessments, which are predominantly written.

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects millions of Americans each year and is often diagnosed and treated in primary care. Evidence shows that self-management techniques, shared decision-making (SDM), and goal setting are effective strategies for managing MDD, but the required collaboration between patients and primary care clinicians can be difficult. Primary Care Path is a program for supporting depression management in primary care that includes a patient-facing mobile app and an accompanying care team–facing web interface. Leveraging programs that provide clinician-facing software with companion patient-facing mobile technology may help patients and physicians align depression treatment and management goals, support effective SDM, alleviate barriers, and improve both clinical care and patient outcomes.

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

The COVID-19 pandemic underscored that access to reliable and expert-driven scientific information is not only essential but also lifesaving. Since 2020, the Italian Society of Pharmacology has been publishing SIF Magazine, an online magazine dedicated to citizens. This journal was created to make pharmacology accessible to the public, highlighting its impact on health and quality of life while clarifying the truths, theories, and misconceptions surrounding drugs and their use.

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

The global demand for assistive devices, such as prosthetics and orthotics, is increasing. A shortage of trained professionals contributes to suboptimal care. To improve clinical workflows, the Life Lounge Clinical Workflow (LLCW) has been developed. Understanding user acceptance is essential for ensuring its successful implementation.

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has transformed learning processes but also raised concerns about potential mental health risks. Medical students represent a particularly vulnerable group due to high academic stress and increasing reliance on generative AI tools for study and decision-making tasks. Despite this, the relationship between AI dependence and psychological distress remains underexplored in Latin American contexts.

Article Thumbnail
Pilot studies (ehealth)

Wearable activity trackers are useful tools to track and monitor physical activity (PA), especially considering their use in free-living environments. Users often see moderate improvements in step count, but consistent increases at various intensities of PA are inconclusive. While wearable research is growing, no known studies specifically examine the relationship between how the use of self-selected social features on wearables affects PA and exercise self-efficacy.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with