Accessibility settings

JMIR Formative Research

Process evaluations, early results, and feasibility/pilot studies of digital and non-digital interventions

Editor-in-Chief:

Amaryllis Mavragani, PhD, Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Canada


Impact Factor 2.4 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 4.2 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Formative Research publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible papers containing results from process evaluations, feasibility/pilot studies and other kinds of formative research and preliminary results. While the original focus was on the design of medical- and health-related research and technology innovations, JMIR Formative Research publishes studies from all areas of medical and health research.

Formative research is research that occurs before a program is designed and implemented, or while a program is being conducted. Formative research can help

  • define and understand populations in need of an intervention or public health program
  • create programs that are specific to the needs of those populations
  • ensure programs are acceptable and feasible to users before launching
  • improve the relationship between users and agencies/research groups
  • demonstrate the feasibility, use, satisfaction with, or problems with a program before large-scale summative evaluation (looking at health outcomes)

Many funding agencies will expect some sort of pilot/feasibility/process evaluation before funding a larger study such as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Formative research should be an integral part of developing or adapting programs and should be used while the program is ongoing to help refine and improve program activities. Thus, formative evaluation can and should also occur in the form of a process evaluation alongside a summative evaluation such as an RCT.

JMIR Formative Research fills an important gap in the academic journals landscape, as it publishes sound and peer-reviewed formative research that is critical for investigators to apply for further funding, but that is usually not published in outcomes-focused medical journals aiming for impact and generalizability.

Summative evaluations of programs and apps/software that have undergone a thorough formative evaluation before launch have a better chance to be published in high-impact flagship journals; thus, we encourage authors to submit - as a first step - their formative evaluations in JMIR Formative Research (and their evaluation protocols to JMIR Research Protocols). 

JMIR Formative Research is indexed in MEDLINEPubMed, PubMed CentralDOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa/Romeo, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

JMIR Formative Research received a 2025 Impact Factor of 2.4, ranking Q2 in Health Care Sciences & Services (97/194).

JMIR Formative Research received a Scopus CiteScore of 4.2 (2025), placing it in the 68th percentile (149/466) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Medicine, and in the 52nd percentile (81/168) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Health Informatics. 


Recent Articles

Alternative text does not exist
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Advances in hardware and software have transformed how users perform activities across various domains by integrating technology in ways that enhance task execution. In education, these processes facilitate pedagogical innovation and learning through diverse interaction models, such as web systems, augmented or virtual reality, and mobile devices. An example of these approaches occurs in the context of cytopathology. Digitization and slide visualization technologies allow the use of real images in a computational environment, enabling an alternative model of interaction between the professional and the samples.

Alternative text does not exist
Pilot studies (ehealth)

Young and middle-aged patients with hypertension often show poor self-management due to limited cognitive bandwidth. Mobile health apps using behavioral economics may be helpful for these patients.

Alternative text does not exist
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Recent work has demonstrated that individuals with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) often experience symptoms of fatigue that are underrepresented in the literature. Conversely, understanding fatigue is highly important to people living with DCM. The AO Spine RECODE-DCM (Research Objectives and Common Data Elements for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy) study group recently determined that no suitable fatigue scales exist for DCM.

Alternative text does not exist
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Though attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is thought to be the most prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder in young people worldwide, there are inequalities in access to psychoeducation and health care support. One way to improve access, potentially increase engagement, reduce health care inequalities, and enhance care is by co-developing digital responsive interventions. These have the potential to support long-term condition management and to act as an adjunct to usual care. Virtual assistants that use large language models can provide information in response to questions and learn to tailor communication to suit an individual user’s needs. This can be especially valuable for people with ADHD who often struggle to regulate attention and can experience communication challenges. Involving people with lived experience in the co-design process is crucial for the development of effective digital interventions. Therefore, this article explores the views and preferences of young people with ADHD and their supporters from the United Kingdom who collaborated with researchers to co-design a prototype chatbot.

Alternative text does not exist
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Alzheimer disease and age-related cognitive decline reduce memory engagement and limit caregiver insight, creating a need for accessible tools that support everyday cognitive activity in older adults. Although AI holds promise for personalized cognitive support, few AI-based apps have been developed and evaluated for memory engagement in this population, and fewer incorporate on-device emotional analysis with privacy-preserving design.

Alternative text does not exist
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Targeting automatic approach tendencies toward alcohol-related stimuli has been shown to significantly reduce relapse rates in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) when used as an add-on to inpatient treatment. Traditional approach-avoidance task (AAT) training requires a clinical setting and a stationary device.

Alternative text does not exist
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects over 850 million individuals worldwide and requires sustained patient education, shared decision-making, and self-management support. Digital health platforms may facilitate these needs; however, many lack comprehensive, user-centered design and fail to address practical and psychosocial patient concerns.

Alternative text does not exist
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of timely infectious disease surveillance. In Japan, conventional sentinel and claims-based systems incur reporting lags and capture limited clinical detail, whereas free-text clinical notes in electronic health records (EHRs) hold richer, timelier symptom and vaccination information. Natural language processing (NLP) with large language models (LLMs) offers a way to structure such free text at scale.

Alternative text does not exist
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate differential diagnoses from clinical narratives. However, LLM-based diagnostic clinical decision support systems still lack a quantitative measure of how strongly a diagnosis is supported by the available case description. Conditional perplexity score quantifies how predictable a target text is given in a preceding context, with lower scores indicating greater predictability. We hypothesized that this concept can be adapted to diagnostic reasoning by treating the prediagnostic case description as the context and a diagnosis as the target text.

Alternative text does not exist
Reviews on Usage or other Formative Evaluation Metrics

Long-term remote patient monitoring of weight, pulse, and blood pressure has been shown to significantly reduce mortality and hospitalization rates among patients with heart failure. Despite its proven effectiveness, maintaining patient engagement in remote monitoring programs remains challenging.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with