Accessibility settings

JMIR Formative Research

Process evaluations, early results, and feasibility/pilot studies of digital and non-digital interventions

Editor-in-Chief:

Amaryllis Mavragani, PhD, Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Canada


Impact Factor 2.1 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 3.5 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Formative Research (JFR, ISSN 2561-326X) publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible papers containing results from process evaluations, feasibility/pilot studies and other kinds of formative research and preliminary results. While the original focus was on the design of medical- and health-related research and technology innovations, JMIR Formative Research publishes studies from all areas of medical and health research.

Formative research is research that occurs before a program is designed and implemented, or while a program is being conducted. Formative research can help

  • define and understand populations in need of an intervention or public health program
  • create programs that are specific to the needs of those populations
  • ensure programs are acceptable and feasible to users before launching
  • improve the relationship between users and agencies/research groups
  • demonstrate the feasibility, use, satisfaction with, or problems with a program before large-scale summative evaluation (looking at health outcomes)

Many funding agencies will expect some sort of pilot/feasibility/process evaluation before funding a larger study such as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Formative research should be an integral part of developing or adapting programs and should be used while the program is ongoing to help refine and improve program activities. Thus, formative evaluation can and should also occur in the form of a process evaluation alongside a summative evaluation such as an RCT.

JMIR Formative Research fills an important gap in the academic journals landscape, as it publishes sound and peer-reviewed formative research that is critical for investigators to apply for further funding, but that is usually not published in outcomes-focused medical journals aiming for impact and generalizability.

Summative evaluations of programs and apps/software that have undergone a thorough formative evaluation before launch have a better chance to be published in high-impact flagship journals; thus, we encourage authors to submit - as a first step - their formative evaluations in JMIR Formative Research (and their evaluation protocols to JMIR Research Protocols). 

JMIR Formative Research is indexed in MEDLINEPubMed, PubMed CentralDOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa/Romeo, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

JMIR Formative Research received a Journal Impact Factor of 2.1 according to the latest release of the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate, 2025.

With a CiteScore of 3.5 (2024) JMIR Formative Research is a Q2 journal in the field of Medicine (miscellaneous), according to Scopus data.

Recent Articles

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Adolescents waiting for mental health treatment often experience significant unmet psychological needs, including severe psychological distress, increased use of maladaptive coping strategies, and feelings of abandonment. However, current wait time support offerings across the mental health sector are sparse and lack clear evidence of effectiveness.

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Evidence-based psychological interventions are usually not accessed by marginalized groups such as refugees. Culturally adapted psychological interventions have reported larger effect sizes than nonadapted psychological interventions. However, the cultural adaptation of interventions is a lengthy process, entailing a challenge. One potential solution to overcome this challenge is the use of artificial intelligence (AI).

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Digital health and connected technologies may support better health outcomes among older adults, including those with multiple chronic conditions or low engagement in health behaviors. However, initial experiences with technology, including during unboxing, setup, and first use, can influence emotional reactions and perceptions and can ultimately determine sustained, meaningful use. Older adults with low technology experience or poor health may be particularly vulnerable to frustration, stress, or abandonment of devices when early interactions are negative.

Article Thumbnail
Early Results in Infodemiology and Infoveillance

Stigmatized women’s health issues, such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and endometriosis, are often marginalized or dismissed in traditional clinical settings. This drives individuals to seek peer support in anonymous online communities such as Reddit. While these digital platforms host critical discussions, they are often designed as static information repositories, failing to account for the complex emotional, temporal, and cultural dynamics that shape users’ support needs. There is a disconnect between the lived experiences of users—particularly feelings of clinical dismissal and the need for culturally specific advice—and the design of the sociotechnical systems they rely on.

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Sleep quality declines with age and is a known contributor to multiple chronic health conditions, including Alzheimer disease. Emerging evidence suggests that certain electroencephalography (EEG) neural signatures measured during sleep may be predictive of cognitive decline in older adults. Sleep EEG signals are traditionally measured using bulky, rigid, and uncomfortable equipment in an unfamiliar laboratory setting, which can negatively impact sleep signals. Due to these limitations, sleep EEG data acquisition is typically limited to a single night.

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

The increasing reliance on patient portals for electronic health records has widened the digital health care access gap, particularly among low-income and Medicaid-insured populations. However, resources exist to assist low-income patients with portal enrollment; in obtaining a free smartphone; and, in New York, in obtaining low-cost internet. Automated bidirectional SMS text messaging offers a scalable and cost-effective strategy for identifying low-income patients’ digital health needs and eligibility for resources by using screening questions and providing tailored information on how to access available resources.

Article Thumbnail
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Curiosity plays a fundamental role in human learning, development, and motivation, and emerging evidence suggests that reduced curiosity is linked to poorer mental health outcomes, including depressive symptoms (DS). However, to date, the majority of curiosity research relies on self-report assessments and thus risks biased reporting. Virtual reality (VR), a novel tool increasingly used within mental health research and treatment, might represent a potent tool for offering ecologically valid insights into curiosity-driven behaviors while circumventing issues related to self-report assessments, including demand characteristics and recall bias.

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Depression is a pervasive global mental health issue, yet access to trained professionals remains severely limited. With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), digital tools are increasingly seen as a viable way to address this shortage. However, questions remain about how digital platforms for mental health care can be effectively designed.

Article Thumbnail
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

HIV incidence has continued to increase among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Peru, despite intervention efforts. Addressing stigma, risky behaviors, and low medication adherence is key to reducing incidence rates. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) allows for collection of discrete, real-time data on stigmatized, risky behaviors while reducing recall bias.

Article Thumbnail
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Conversational agents (artificial intelligence [AI]–based chatbots) offer a novel approach to health interventions by providing personalized, adaptive interactions that improve over time based on user engagement. In nutrition education, given the wide variation in knowledge, skills, and abilities across participants, AI-based chatbots have the potential to enhance accessibility, engagement, and behavior change. Food is Medicine (FIM) interventions, which aim to improve food security and diet quality among multicultural, at-risk populations, often face challenges related to sustained engagement and use.

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

The transition from adolescence to adulthood (18 to 25 years) is associated with an increased risk of suicidal ideation and behaviors. Suicide-focused cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) have been shown to significantly reduce suicidal ideation and behaviors but are not widely available to high-risk individuals. Digital therapeutics could improve access to these treatments.

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

This study develops an open-source large language model–based chatbot tailored for Korean health consultations. The chatbot was implemented using the retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) technique alongside metadata filtering to enhance its performance.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with