Accessibility settings

JMIR Formative Research

Process evaluations, early results, and feasibility/pilot studies of digital and non-digital interventions

Editor-in-Chief:

Amaryllis Mavragani, PhD, Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Canada


Impact Factor 2.4 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 4.2 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Formative Research publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible papers containing results from process evaluations, feasibility/pilot studies and other kinds of formative research and preliminary results. While the original focus was on the design of medical- and health-related research and technology innovations, JMIR Formative Research publishes studies from all areas of medical and health research.

Formative research is research that occurs before a program is designed and implemented, or while a program is being conducted. Formative research can help

  • define and understand populations in need of an intervention or public health program
  • create programs that are specific to the needs of those populations
  • ensure programs are acceptable and feasible to users before launching
  • improve the relationship between users and agencies/research groups
  • demonstrate the feasibility, use, satisfaction with, or problems with a program before large-scale summative evaluation (looking at health outcomes)

Many funding agencies will expect some sort of pilot/feasibility/process evaluation before funding a larger study such as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Formative research should be an integral part of developing or adapting programs and should be used while the program is ongoing to help refine and improve program activities. Thus, formative evaluation can and should also occur in the form of a process evaluation alongside a summative evaluation such as an RCT.

JMIR Formative Research fills an important gap in the academic journals landscape, as it publishes sound and peer-reviewed formative research that is critical for investigators to apply for further funding, but that is usually not published in outcomes-focused medical journals aiming for impact and generalizability.

Summative evaluations of programs and apps/software that have undergone a thorough formative evaluation before launch have a better chance to be published in high-impact flagship journals; thus, we encourage authors to submit - as a first step - their formative evaluations in JMIR Formative Research (and their evaluation protocols to JMIR Research Protocols). 

JMIR Formative Research is indexed in MEDLINEPubMed, PubMed CentralDOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa/Romeo, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

JMIR Formative Research received a 2025 Impact Factor of 2.4, ranking Q2 in Health Care Sciences & Services (97/194).

JMIR Formative Research received a Scopus CiteScore of 4.2 (2025), placing it in the 68th percentile (149/466) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Medicine, and in the 52nd percentile (81/168) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Health Informatics. 


Recent Articles

Diverse colleagues collaborating on a laptop, discussing business strategy.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Measurement-based care (MBC) and shared decision-making can improve clinical outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in primary care. However, primary care providers often have limited time to administer patient-reported outcome measures recommended for MBC. Digital health tools like the Pathway Platform can help facilitate MBC and patient-provider engagement, aiding enhanced shared decision-making.

Plus-size woman taking a selfie during an outdoor workout with water bottle and resistance bands
Formative Evaluation of Non-Ehealth Innovations

Obesity is a chronic disease requiring long-term treatment, yet current treatment models do not align with the chronicity of obesity. Current guidelines provide limited direction on how to adapt treatment to support weight loss maintenance as adolescents transition into emerging adulthood, a distinct developmental period from the late teens to the mid-to-late twenties.

Elderly woman smiles as dentist scans her teeth with 3D scanner for dental implants.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Older adults living with dementia often have limited tolerance for intraoral procedures, which can restrict access to even basic oral health assessment in clinical care. Procedural burden—characterized by sustained intraoral manipulation, sensory overload, and limited opportunities for interruption—may represent a key barrier to equitable oral care. Intraoral scanning (IOS) enables stepwise, interruptible acquisition of oral data and may reduce this burden, but feasibility and tolerability in people living with dementia have not been systematically evaluated.

Elderly man on a telehealth call with a doctor, discussing medication
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Telemedicine offers promising solutions for improving access to care among older adults with chronic conditions, but there is limited evidence on how older patients navigate and engage with video telehealth in their home environments.

Psychological therapy notes on desk with glasses, keyboard, and flowers
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Clinical course information, including disease onset, episode recurrence, and hospitalization history, is essential for psychiatric care and research. However, these data are embedded in unstructured clinical narratives with substantial linguistic variability, making manual extraction labor-intensive and rule-based extraction difficult to scale. Fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) may flexibly extract such information from privacy-sensitive psychiatric records.

Young Asian woman wearing headphones, holding a tablet on a blue sofa.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

While technology can widen access to mental health treatments, digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) frequently have low engagement and high dropout rates. A better understanding of user engagement with DMHIs can help researchers design technologies that users are more likely to benefit from. However, a major challenge is that the term “engagement” is very broad, not well-understood, and operationalized differently across projects. Few studies have explored how clinical researchers define and operationalize engagement in DMHI research.

Woman with supplements and laptop in kitchen
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Adolescents and young adults with chronic health conditions often struggle to adhere to their daily oral medications. Transdiagnostic mobile health (mHealth) interventions have the potential to promote medication adherence by reaching youth at a large scale.

Mother breastfeeding baby while looking at phone, seated on a green couch.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Infant feeding practices, including breastfeeding, are known to benefit maternal and child health outcomes. Therefore, parent access to evidence-based infant feeding advice is critical. In recent years, there has been increased use of digital health technologies to support infant feeding. Despite its potential, using AI to complement existing health care and connect families to timely infant feeding support remains relatively unexplored.

Two women in face masks on a video call, one holding documents.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Epidemiological and biological risks frequently expose Caribbean territories to emerging infectious threats. Martinique, a French overseas territory, is particularly vulnerable due to its tropical climate, insular geography, and recurrent exposure to arboviral epidemics. During exceptional health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, health care systems must rapidly adapt to a potentially sustained patient influx, evolving scientific knowledge, and heightened population anxiety. In March 2020, following the first confirmed COVID-19 cases in Martinique, the emergency medical service (EMS) implemented a teleconsultation follow-up unit dedicated to home-based patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, in the context of uncertainty regarding disease progression.

Person's hands holding a smartphone with a dark interface displaying audio controls.
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Sense of agency (SoA) is the subjective experience of controlling one’s actions and their effects in the world. SoA is important for behavioral change and goal achievement, and its measurement via digital devices has gained attention in health promotion and therapeutic interventions.

Scientist in lab coat examines test tube with DNA analysis on computer screen
Pilot studies (ehealth)

Enrollment in phase I oncology trials remains low largely because potentially eligible patients are not identified and evaluated quickly enough. Current clinical trial matching systems can identify candidate patients from the electronic health record, but cases with missing or uncertain eligibility data are often routed for offline manual review. This delay impedes clarification and prolongs the final eligibility determination.

Businesswoman managing tasks, calendar, and analytics on mobile
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is increasingly used in digital health research to capture behaviors, symptoms, and psychological states in real time and in natural environments, offering advantages over traditional retrospective measures in terms of ecological validity and reduced recall bias. Despite the potential of EMA for advancing mobile health and digital phenotyping apps, accessible technical solutions that enable researchers without software engineering expertise to design and deploy EMA studies remain limited.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with