Accessibility settings

JMIR Formative Research

Process evaluations, early results, and feasibility/pilot studies of digital and non-digital interventions

Editor-in-Chief:

Amaryllis Mavragani, PhD, Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Canada


Impact Factor 2.4 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 4.2 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Formative Research publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible papers containing results from process evaluations, feasibility/pilot studies and other kinds of formative research and preliminary results. While the original focus was on the design of medical- and health-related research and technology innovations, JMIR Formative Research publishes studies from all areas of medical and health research.

Formative research is research that occurs before a program is designed and implemented, or while a program is being conducted. Formative research can help

  • define and understand populations in need of an intervention or public health program
  • create programs that are specific to the needs of those populations
  • ensure programs are acceptable and feasible to users before launching
  • improve the relationship between users and agencies/research groups
  • demonstrate the feasibility, use, satisfaction with, or problems with a program before large-scale summative evaluation (looking at health outcomes)

Many funding agencies will expect some sort of pilot/feasibility/process evaluation before funding a larger study such as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Formative research should be an integral part of developing or adapting programs and should be used while the program is ongoing to help refine and improve program activities. Thus, formative evaluation can and should also occur in the form of a process evaluation alongside a summative evaluation such as an RCT.

JMIR Formative Research fills an important gap in the academic journals landscape, as it publishes sound and peer-reviewed formative research that is critical for investigators to apply for further funding, but that is usually not published in outcomes-focused medical journals aiming for impact and generalizability.

Summative evaluations of programs and apps/software that have undergone a thorough formative evaluation before launch have a better chance to be published in high-impact flagship journals; thus, we encourage authors to submit - as a first step - their formative evaluations in JMIR Formative Research (and their evaluation protocols to JMIR Research Protocols). 

JMIR Formative Research is indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, DOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa/Romeo, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

JMIR Formative Research received a 2025 Impact Factor of 2.4, ranking Q2 in Health Care Sciences & Services (97/194).

JMIR Formative Research received a Scopus CiteScore of 4.2 (2025), placing it in the 68th percentile (149/466) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Medicine, and in the 52nd percentile (81/168) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Health Informatics. 


Recent Articles

Alternative text does not exist
Viewpoint

Digital mental health has become increasingly capable of representing and adapting to individuals in time. When support is delivered through another person, however, the relevant decision context includes conditions that cannot be specified from the primary user alone. This viewpoint proposes making selected conditions relevant to a support decision within a specified relationship explicit. We introduce relational ecological momentary assessment (REMA) as a conceptual method for representing these conditions in a relational decision space. In its initial dyadic implementation, REMA combines a low-burden report of the primary user’s emotional zone (Z) with supporter contact availability (Cp) and supporter capacity (Cs). The meaning of these reports depends on the relationship and the proposed form of support. Willingness, consent, and safety determine whether an action is permissible to consider, while data validity concerns whether the reports are current and interpretable. These conditions and rules delimit relational support eligibility by specifying which classes of support can still be considered. Coregulation as a reciprocal temporal process remains outside the scope of this implementation. We situate the proposal within research on ecological momentary assessment, just-in-time adaptive interventions, dyadic digital health, and systemic digital mental health; provide a hypothetical implementation example; and show how 1 Z report can inform separate decisions involving different supporters. REMA remains conceptual and requires empirical evaluation. Its broader proposition is that when digital health recruits another person, the decision-relevant conditions across that specified relationship should be made explicit.

Woman smiling while looking at her smartphone outdoors
Case Report

Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) has shown promise for the treatment of panic disorder (PD), but little is known about its feasibility and use across cultures and languages.

Healthcare team discusses transitional care digital intervention flowchart on screen
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Transitions of care, where patients move between clinical settings or providers, pose considerable risks to patient safety, situations exacerbated by the absence of adequate digital infrastructure that enables information exchange. The timeliness and accuracy of medication information transfer are central to ensuring patient safety during transitions of care, including post-discharge from the hospital. In designing a multifaceted digital intervention to support the transfer of medication information from hospital to community settings, it was necessary to gauge the views of all relevant stakeholders on the practical challenges involved in transferring medication information.

Elderly man in a kitchen using a smartphone, with breakfast items on the counter
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Mobile health is emerging as a ubiquitous paradigm for delivering health care interventions when self-management is feasible. However, interventions targeting older or frail participants should account for age-related cognitive, visual, and physical needs to optimize usability and long-term retention.

Woman waving at doctor on video call for telehealth consultation
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Virtual consultations (VCs), including telephone and video consultations, are increasingly central to primary care. However, evaluation often prioritizes patient satisfaction or technology over quality and safety. Existing frameworks incorporate limited input from general practitioners (GPs) and lack standardized quality and safety indicators.

Hands placing green roulette chips on a betting table, casino gambling
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Gambling disorder (GD) carries a disproportionate burden of suicide risk. Clinicians frequently encounter patients with suicidal ideation (SI) at treatment entry, yet no published study has examined whether SI at intake predicts treatment engagement or symptom change in GD care.

Doctor using a tablet for telemedicine, discussing healthcare technology
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

The Secondary Care Medicines Data (SCMD) makes detailed data on medicines issued by National Health Service (NHS) hospital trusts in England openly available for the first time. These data provide an opportunity to understand medicine use patterns, highlight variation, and drive improvements in evidence-based practice, prescribing safety, and cost-effectiveness. However, this dataset requires extensive domain and technical knowledge to access, clean, transform, and link to other external sources before it can be used effectively.

Couple reviewing hospital patient care data on a monitor in a modern hospital room with city view
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Health care public reporting (PR) systems are intended to reduce information asymmetry and support informed health care decision-making. However, their adoption remains limited, partly because health care information is complex, difficult to interpret, and may evoke cognitive and emotional responses. Existing research has focused largely on system design and development, with limited attention to how users’ central and peripheral-route information-processing mechanisms shape PR system adoption.

Man in glasses uses smartphone, woman reads book on sofa
Pilot studies (ehealth)

Informal caregivers play a central role in long-term care but experience elevated risks of stress, depressive symptoms, and caregiver burden, alongside barriers to accessing preventive support. Low-threshold digital public health interventions may offer scalable support; however, evidence on their feasibility, usability, and contextual fit remains limited, particularly for heterogeneous caregiver populations.

Woman checking Moodmetric score on smartphone with wearable ring
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Wearable physiological sensing and mobile self-report methods offer new opportunities for monitoring occupational well-being in real-world settings. However, interpreting continuous physiological signals in relation to psychological states such as job burnout and work engagement remains challenging, particularly when using deployable systems that rely on proprietary signal processing.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with