JMIR Formative Research

Process evaluations, early results, and feasibility/pilot studies of digital and non-digital interventions

Editor-in-Chief:

Amaryllis Mavragani, PhD, Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Canada


Impact Factor 2.1 CiteScore 3.5

JMIR Formative Research (JFR, ISSN 2561-326X) publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible papers containing results from process evaluations, feasibility/pilot studies and other kinds of formative research and preliminary results. While the original focus was on the design of medical- and health-related research and technology innovations, JMIR Formative Research publishes studies from all areas of medical and health research.

Formative research is research that occurs before a program is designed and implemented, or while a program is being conducted. Formative research can help

  • define and understand populations in need of an intervention or public health program
  • create programs that are specific to the needs of those populations
  • ensure programs are acceptable and feasible to users before launching
  • improve the relationship between users and agencies/research groups
  • demonstrate the feasibility, use, satisfaction with, or problems with a program before large-scale summative evaluation (looking at health outcomes)

Many funding agencies will expect some sort of pilot/feasibility/process evaluation before funding a larger study such as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Formative research should be an integral part of developing or adapting programs and should be used while the program is ongoing to help refine and improve program activities. Thus, formative evaluation can and should also occur in the form of a process evaluation alongside a summative evaluation such as an RCT.

JMIR Formative Research fills an important gap in the academic journals landscape, as it publishes sound and peer-reviewed formative research that is critical for investigators to apply for further funding, but that is usually not published in outcomes-focused medical journals aiming for impact and generalizability.

Summative evaluations of programs and apps/software that have undergone a thorough formative evaluation before launch have a better chance to be published in high-impact flagship journals; thus, we encourage authors to submit - as a first step - their formative evaluations in JMIR Formative Research (and their evaluation protocols to JMIR Research Protocols). 

JMIR Formative Research is indexed in MEDLINEPubMed, PubMed CentralDOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa/Romeo, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

JMIR Formative Research received a Journal Impact Factor of 2.1 according to the latest release of the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate, 2025.

With a CiteScore of 3.5 (2024) JMIR Formative Research is a Q2 journal in the field of Medicine (miscellaneous), according to Scopus data.

Recent Articles

Article Thumbnail
Research Letter

Findings from a pilot randomized trial of 916 households indicated the outreach text messages were not an effective strategy to improve participation in United States Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) among eligible households in Arizona.

|
Article Thumbnail
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Early mobilization seems to benefit patients with acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF), but its initiation is challenging due to severe dyspnea, clinical instability, and low adherence to treatment. Understanding whether the early mobilization has good acceptance, adherence, and safety is a key point of rehabilitation in this population. Virtual reality (VR) offers a less stressful environment and may reduce dyspnea, yet its effects in ADHF remain unknown. In addition, the feasibility and safety of combining VR with an early mobilization program in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting are not fully established.

|
Article Thumbnail
Pilot studies (ehealth)

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a powerful tool to prevent the transmission of HIV. Interventions promoting PrEP must focus on populations most impacted by systemic barriers to uptake. Historically, young sexual minority men (YSMM) and transgender women have the highest demonstrated rates of new HIV diagnoses, but prevalence within other gender minority populations is now being studied. Few interventions have focused on addressing PrEP uptake with sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY), particularly through mobile health (mHealth) technologies. Built on the successful foundation of the HealthMpowerment (HMP) Platform, PrEPresent aimed to engage SGMY across diverse gender and racial and ethnic identities in the Greater Los Angeles area.

|
Article Thumbnail
Pilot studies (non-ehealth)

Approximately half of US veterans receive care outside of US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Health Administration facilities—a proportion expected to rise due to the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act and expanded use of VA-purchased community care.

|
Article Thumbnail
Pilot studies (ehealth)

Experiences of unfair treatment on college campuses are linked to adverse mental and physical health outcomes, highlighting the need for interventions. However, detecting such experiences relies mainly on self-reports. No prior research has examined the feasibility of using mobile sensing via smartphones and wearables for the passive detection of these experiences.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Safe patient handling is critical for reducing musculoskeletal injuries among health care workers; yet, community health care workers often face barriers such as limited access to training and real-time resources.

|
Article Thumbnail
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Discharge instructions are essential for patients after hospital care but are time-consuming to write. With the rise of large language models (LLMs), there is a strong potential to automate this process. This study explores the use of open-source LLMs for generating discharge instructions.

|
Article Thumbnail
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Co-design is a collaborative approach involving end users, stakeholders, and designers in creating digital tools for healthcare. This study focuses on the co-design and evaluation of Behavior Emotion Therapy System and You (BETSY), a mental health chatbot and digital human for mild to moderate anxiety.

|
Article Thumbnail
Viewpoint

Artificial intelligence holds the potential to enhance the efficiency of clinical research. Yet, like all innovations, its impact is dependent upon target user uptake and adoption. As efforts to leverage artificial intelligence for clinical trial screening become more widespread, it is imperative that implementation science principles be incorporated in both the design and roll-out of user-facing tools. We present and discuss implementation themes considered to be highly relevant by target users of artificial intelligence-enabled clinical trial screening platforms. Identified themes range from design features that optimize usability to collaboration with tool designers to improve transparency and trust. These themes generally mapped to domains of existing implementation science frameworks such as the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Designers should consider incorporating an implementation science framework early in the development process to not only ensure a user-centered design but to inform how tools are integrated into existing clinical research workflows.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Early-onset alcohol use (EOAU), or drinking before age 14, is a serious but highly preventable risk factor for later alcohol use. EOAU often begins at home, with sips of alcohol provided by parents. Few scalable interventions are available to engage parents in EOAU prevention.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Noncommunicable diseases, particularly hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and obesity, are on the rise among older adults in Singapore, emphasizing the need for effective screening, monitoring, and educational interventions. The traditional healthcare model, relying on in-person visits to review patients, poses risks of underreported cases and missed opportunities for early interventions to manage complications. Community-based telemonitoring programs present promising opportunities to extend telehealth services to underserved populations, thereby mitigating the digital divide and addressing health inequalities.

|
Article Thumbnail
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Laterality errors in radiology reports can endanger patient safety. Effective methods for screening for laterality errors in combined radiographic reports, which combine multiple studies into one, remain unexplored.

|

Preprints Open for Peer-Review

We are working in partnership with