Accessibility settings

JMIR Formative Research

Process evaluations, early results, and feasibility/pilot studies of digital and non-digital interventions

Editor-in-Chief:

Amaryllis Mavragani, PhD, Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Canada


Impact Factor 2.4 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 4.2 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Formative Research publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible papers containing results from process evaluations, feasibility/pilot studies and other kinds of formative research and preliminary results. While the original focus was on the design of medical- and health-related research and technology innovations, JMIR Formative Research publishes studies from all areas of medical and health research.

Formative research is research that occurs before a program is designed and implemented, or while a program is being conducted. Formative research can help

  • define and understand populations in need of an intervention or public health program
  • create programs that are specific to the needs of those populations
  • ensure programs are acceptable and feasible to users before launching
  • improve the relationship between users and agencies/research groups
  • demonstrate the feasibility, use, satisfaction with, or problems with a program before large-scale summative evaluation (looking at health outcomes)

Many funding agencies will expect some sort of pilot/feasibility/process evaluation before funding a larger study such as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Formative research should be an integral part of developing or adapting programs and should be used while the program is ongoing to help refine and improve program activities. Thus, formative evaluation can and should also occur in the form of a process evaluation alongside a summative evaluation such as an RCT.

JMIR Formative Research fills an important gap in the academic journals landscape, as it publishes sound and peer-reviewed formative research that is critical for investigators to apply for further funding, but that is usually not published in outcomes-focused medical journals aiming for impact and generalizability.

Summative evaluations of programs and apps/software that have undergone a thorough formative evaluation before launch have a better chance to be published in high-impact flagship journals; thus, we encourage authors to submit - as a first step - their formative evaluations in JMIR Formative Research (and their evaluation protocols to JMIR Research Protocols). 

JMIR Formative Research is indexed in MEDLINEPubMed, PubMed CentralDOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa/Romeo, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

JMIR Formative Research received a 2025 Impact Factor of 2.4, ranking Q2 in Health Care Sciences & Services (97/194).

JMIR Formative Research received a Scopus CiteScore of 4.2 (2025), placing it in the 68th percentile (149/466) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Medicine, and in the 52nd percentile (81/168) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Health Informatics. 


Recent Articles

Alternative text does not exist
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Alzheimer disease and age-related cognitive decline reduce memory engagement and limit caregiver insight, creating a need for accessible tools that support everyday cognitive activity in older adults. Although AI holds promise for personalized cognitive support, few AI-based apps have been developed and evaluated for memory engagement in this population, and fewer incorporate on-device emotional analysis with privacy-preserving design.

Alternative text does not exist
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Targeting automatic approach tendencies toward alcohol-related stimuli has been shown to significantly reduce relapse rates in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) when used as an add-on to inpatient treatment. Traditional approach-avoidance task (AAT) training requires a clinical setting and a stationary device.

Alternative text does not exist
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects over 850 million individuals worldwide and requires sustained patient education, shared decision-making, and self-management support. Digital health platforms may facilitate these needs; however, many lack comprehensive, user-centered design and fail to address practical and psychosocial patient concerns.

Alternative text does not exist
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of timely infectious disease surveillance. In Japan, conventional sentinel and claims-based systems incur reporting lags and capture limited clinical detail, whereas free-text clinical notes in electronic health records (EHRs) hold richer, timelier symptom and vaccination information. Natural language processing (NLP) with large language models (LLMs) offers a way to structure such free text at scale.

Alternative text does not exist
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate differential diagnoses from clinical narratives. However, LLM-based diagnostic clinical decision support systems still lack a quantitative measure of how strongly a diagnosis is supported by the available case description. Conditional perplexity score quantifies how predictable a target text is given in a preceding context, with lower scores indicating greater predictability. We hypothesized that this concept can be adapted to diagnostic reasoning by treating the prediagnostic case description as the context and a diagnosis as the target text.

Alternative text does not exist
Reviews on Usage or other Formative Evaluation Metrics

Long-term remote patient monitoring of weight, pulse, and blood pressure has been shown to significantly reduce mortality and hospitalization rates among patients with heart failure. Despite its proven effectiveness, maintaining patient engagement in remote monitoring programs remains challenging.

Medical image showing a gallstone in the gallbladder with superimposed diagram of bile ducts.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

The integration of AI into intraoperative surgical imaging represents an emerging frontier in digital health. Despite advances in preoperative computed tomography (CT)–based surgical planning, real-time translation of imaging data into actionable intraoperative guidance remains limited by CT-to-body divergence—a fundamental information gap between preoperative digital models and the dynamic surgical field. This divergence, driven by lung deflation under anesthesia and positional changes, represents a critical digital-to-physical registration challenge that current preoperative imaging workflows fail to address in real time.

Nurses collaborating around a computer screen displaying data charts and graphs
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are widely implemented in hospitals, yet their uptake in nursing practice remains inconsistent. While electronic health records continuously capture nursing decision data, these data are rarely used to support structured quality improvement. Decision mining offers a novel approach by reconstructing and visualizing decision logic from clinical decision logs to support retrospective reflection and protocol evaluation rather than real-time alerting. Before such tools can be integrated into quality improvement programs, their acceptance by clinical users must be empirically examined.

Woman in blue shirt working on laptop in home office with bookshelves
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

As digital technologies become increasingly integrated into psychological practice, the demand for competencies in digital clinical psychology is growing. Although competency frameworks for digital clinical practice exist, validated instruments to assess these competencies remain scarce. In Sweden, psychology master’s students are now being offered digital psychology courses, increasing the need for instruments to measure intended improvements in knowledge and abilities. Using AI to assist with translation procedures can facilitate the adaptation of existing instruments to new national and cultural contexts.

Doctor shows patient a tablet with a medical questionnaire, discussing health history.
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Digital technologies in emergency medical services (EMS) have become crucial for patient outcomes and survival, and the integration of novel technologies drives rapid transformation within EMS. Understanding the acceptance and use of digital technology among EMS health care providers is paramount for implementation and effective use of novel digital tools. Currently, instruments assessing acceptance of technology are lacking within the Swedish EMS context.

Young boy wearing a VR headset and holding controllers, playing a video game at home.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Gamification, defined as the application of game design principles in nongame contexts, has garnered increasing attention for its potential to enhance motivation and engagement across various fields, including medical education and training. However, there is a lack of virtual reality (VR)–based simulations on pneumatic reduction of intussusception (PRI) in children in Brunei, thereby limiting practical training opportunities for medical students and surgical trainees.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with