Search Results (1 to 10 of 940 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 251 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 200 JMIR Research Protocols
- 102 JMIR Formative Research
- 86 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 40 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 35 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 35 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 26 JMIR Human Factors
- 21 JMIR Mental Health
- 20 JMIR Cancer
- 17 JMIR Serious Games
- 16 JMIR Medical Education
- 14 JMIR Aging
- 11 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 10 Iproceedings
- 8 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 8 JMIR Diabetes
- 7 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 6 JMIR Cardio
- 6 JMIRx Med
- 5 JMIR Dermatology
- 5 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 3 JMIR AI
- 3 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Infodemiology
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR Nursing
- 1 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Answer choices included: 0 (“I do not think of suicide or death”), 1 (“I feel that life is empty or wonder if it’s worth living”), 2 (“I think of suicide or death several times a week for several minutes”), and 3 (“I think of suicide or death several times a day in some detail, or I have made specific plans for suicide or have actually tried to take my life”).
An item from the CGI-BDD was used to determine whether participants perceived their past-week BDD symptoms improving or worsening.
JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e63605
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
We did not seek ethics approval in accordance with the Commision Nationale Informatique et Libertés policy on secondary analyses of preexisting datasets (Titles I and II) [9], as patients were informed that their data may be securely stored, coded for confidentiality, and used for research unless they explicitly object.
To assess the consistency of newly generated artificial data, fidelity scores were calculated.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e63130
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Sixteen studies used outcome measures or diagnostic frameworks (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales, CES-D, PHQ-9, PHQ-8, BDI, and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), whereas 20 used participants’ diagnostic statements (eg, “I was diagnosed with depression”) or did not provide relevant information. Language features (n=17, 85%) were the most commonly examined features, followed by social media activity (n=8, 40%), temporal (n=4, 20%), and demographic (n=3, 15%) features.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e59002
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
For usability testing, participants completed the 30-item USE questionnaire [65] which contains 4 subscales assessing usefulness (eg, “It helps me be more effective”), ease of use (eg, “It is easy to use”), ease of learning (eg, “I learned to use it quickly”), and satisfaction (eg, “I am satisfied with it”) on an 8-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 8=strongly agree).
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e65188
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Sample items include “I think that I would like to use bhoos frequently” and “I thought bhoos was easy to use.” Responses to each item range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Possible scores on the SUS range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating higher overall usability of a system or program. The SUS has been used in roughly 3500 surveys within 273 studies evaluating a range of systems, interfaces, and programs [37]. Internal consistency of the SUS was good (α=0.84).
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e69873
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS