Search Articles

Health Equity in the Effectiveness of Web-Based Health Interventions for the Self-Care of People With Chronic Health Conditions: Systematic Review

[56,62,63,72], 6 had high RoB [55,57,60,61,64,69], and 3 did not have enough information to assess RoB [58,66,67].

Sophie Turnbull, Christie Cabral, Alastair Hay, Patricia J Lucas

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(6):e17849

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Digital Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Older Adults: Protocol for a Systematic Review

*” OR “social media” OR “smartphone$” OR “web*” OR “mobile app*” OR “smartphone app*” OR “VR” OR “AR” OR “virtual reality” OR “augmented reality” OR “wearable tech*” OR “wearable$” OR “computer*” OR “personal digital assistant$” OR “PDA$” OR “laptop$” OR “e-reader

Indira Riadi, Lucy Kervin, Kelly Teo, Ryan Churchill, Theodore D Cosco

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(12):e22738

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Comparison of Multivariable Logistic Regression and Other Machine Learning Algorithms for Prognostic Prediction Studies in Pregnancy Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

-133,135-140,143,144,146,148, 150-154,156,159-168,170], and 1 (0.7%) unclear ROB study (Table 3) [124].

Herdiantri Sufriyana, Atina Husnayain, Ya-Lin Chen, Chao-Yang Kuo, Onkar Singh, Tso-Yang Yeh, Yu-Wei Wu, Emily Chia-Yu Su

JMIR Med Inform 2020;8(11):e16503

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Caregiver-Focused, Web-Based Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Part 2)

The risk of bias (RoB) found in individual studies was assessed by one reviewer and verified by a second reviewer.

Jenny Ploeg, Muhammad Usman Ali, Maureen Markle-Reid, Ruta Valaitis, Amy Bartholomew, Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Carrie McAiney, Diana Sherifali

J Med Internet Res 2018;20(10):e11247

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Impact of Internet-Based Interventions on Caregiver Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

internet-based intervention that could have included minimal guidance on information resources or website use [34,37,38,41,42,44], usual care with or without additional information [36,39,40,43,45,47], printed information [46], or electronic communications (eg, e-bulletins

Diana Sherifali, Muhammad Usman Ali, Jenny Ploeg, Maureen Markle-Reid, Ruta Valaitis, Amy Bartholomew, Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Carrie McAiney

J Med Internet Res 2018;20(7):e10668

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Accuracy of Machine Learning Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies

However, when a study provided no information about the validation process, low RoB was assumed if independent datasets were used for training, building a model, and validation [15].

Sun Jae Moon, Jinseub Hwang, Rajesh Kana, John Torous, Jung Won Kim

JMIR Ment Health 2019;6(12):e14108

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Tailored Communication Within Mobile Apps for Diabetes Self-Management: A Systematic Review

The ROB scoring was performed individually by 3 researchers (HH, AKW, and LR) and discussed to achieve consensus.

Heidi Holmen, Astrid Klopstad Wahl, Milada Cvancarova Småstuen, Lis Ribu

J Med Internet Res 2017;19(6):e227

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Improving Patients’ Medication Adherence and Outcomes in Nonhospital Settings Through eHealth: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Fisher exact test of independence was employed.Assessment of Methodological QualityTwo reviewers (BS and ZSYW) also performed quality assessment for the studies included using the Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias (RoB) assessment tool via RevMan version

Zoie SY Wong, Braylien Siy, Katharina Da Silva Lopes, Andrew Georgiou

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e17015

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Web-Based Interventions for Dietary Behavior in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

components, website usability rates, modes and methods of delivery, and process evaluation measures.Assessment of Study Risk of BiasThe risk of bias was assessed by two researchers independently using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB

Jedha Dening, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam, Elena George, Ralph Maddison

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e16437

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Effectiveness of Wearable Trackers on Physical Activity in Healthy Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

A GRADE Summary of Evidence table is provided in Multimedia Appendix 4.Figure 7GRADE Working Group grades of evidence summary.Risk of Bias Across ResultsRisk of bias (ROB) is measured using the Cochrane risk of bias tool [13] for randomized controlled trials

Matilda Swee Sun Tang, Katherine Moore, Andrew McGavigan, Robyn A Clark, Anand N Ganesan

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(7):e15576

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS