Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Advertisement

Currently submitted to: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Apr 9, 2020
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 9, 2020 - May 25, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer-Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Recruitment of participants and participant’s appreciation of a virtual supermarket testing pricing and nudging strategies: A feasibility study

  • Jody Chantal Hoenink; 
  • Joreintje D. Mackenbach; 
  • Nynke van der Laan; 
  • Jeroen Lakerveld; 
  • Wilma Waterlander; 
  • Joline W.J. Beulens; 

ABSTRACT

Background:

Virtual supermarkets offer a practical and affordable means to test the efficacy of different pricing and nudging strategies before they are implemented in real-world settings. Despite the advantages of using virtual supermarkets, conducting studies an online settings have the disadvantage of participants being more difficult to recruit and retain.

Objective:

To describe the costs, feasibility and results of several recruitment strategies and participants’ appreciation and usability of the Supreme Nudge Virtual Supermarket (SN VirtuMart).

Methods:

This cross sectional study used data from a randomized controlled trial where 455 Dutch adults with low or high educational level were asked to conduct five shops within a three-dimensional virtual supermarket. The SN VirtuMart, developed in 2018, resembled a Dutch supermarket containing almost 1200 unique food and beverage products. Participants were asked to conduct five shops in the SN VirtuMart and complete questionnaires on demographics, food purchasing habits and feedback on the SN VirtuMart. A log to track the costs of the different recruitment strategies was kept by the study team. Outcome measures included the cost of recruitment strategies, recruitment and attrition rates, and appreciation and usability of the SN VirtuMart.

Results:

In total, 346 participants completed the study (completion rate: 74%). The median age was 31.0 (IQR: 25.0) and 45.4% were highly educated. N=235 (52%) were recruited via social media campaigns, N=131 (29%) via home-delivered flyers, N=38 (8%) via flyers received from the study team and N=46 (10%) via word-of-mouth. Out of all paid recruitment strategies, social media campaigns were the cheapest and flyers received from the study team was the most expensive recruitment strategy. Participant demographics varied by recruitment strategy. Most participants found the SN VirtuMart easy to use (90.8%) and found that their purchases resembled those made in real life (78.2%).

Conclusions:

Using different recruitment strategies resulted in an efficient recruitment of a representative study sample and retention of participants was relatively high. The SN VirtuMart was generally appreciated by the participants. It thus seems feasible to use the SN VirtuMart to test the efficacy of different pricing and nudging strategies before they are implemented in real-world settings. Clinical Trial: The trial conducted in the SN VirtuMart was registered in the Dutch trial registry (www.trialregister.nl) under report number NTR7293.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hoenink JC, Mackenbach JD, van der Laan N, Lakerveld J, Waterlander W, Beulens JW

Recruitment of participants and participant’s appreciation of a virtual supermarket testing pricing and nudging strategies: A feasibility study

JMIR Preprints. 09/04/2020:19234

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.19234

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/19234

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.