TY - JOUR AU - Linden-Carmichael, Ashley AU - Stull, Samuel W AU - Wang, Danny AU - Bhandari, Sandesh AU - Lanza, Stephanie T PY - 2024 DA - 2024/12/5 TI - Impact of Providing a Personalized Data Dashboard on Ecological Momentary Assessment Compliance Among College Students Who Use Substances: Pilot Microrandomized Trial JO - JMIR Form Res SP - e60193 VL - 8 KW - ecological momentary assessment KW - data dashboard KW - study compliance KW - substance use KW - substance use behavior KW - college student KW - alcohol KW - cannabis KW - cannabis use KW - personalized data dashboard KW - EMA protocol KW - EMA KW - health behaviors KW - survey KW - compliance KW - self-reported AB - Background: The landscape of substance use behavior among young adults has observed rapid changes over time. Intensive longitudinal designs are ideal for examining and intervening in substance use behavior in real time but rely on high participant compliance in the study protocol, representing a significant challenge for researchers. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of including a personalized data dashboard (DD) in a text-based survey prompt on study compliance outcomes among college students participating in a 21-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study. Methods: Participants (N=91; 61/91, 67% female and 84/91, 92% White) were college students who engaged in recent alcohol and cannabis use. Participants were randomized to either complete a 21-day EMA protocol with 4 prompts/d (EMA Group) or complete the same EMA protocol with 1 personalized message and a DD indicating multiple metrics of progress in the study, delivered at 1 randomly selected prompt/d (EMA+DD Group) via a microrandomized design. Study compliance, completion time, self-reported protocol experiences, and qualitative responses were assessed for both groups. Results: Levels of compliance were similar across groups. Participants in the EMA+DD Group had overall faster completion times, with significant week-level differences in weeks 2 and 3 of the study (P=.047 and P=.03, respectively). Although nonsignificant, small-to-medium effect sizes were observed when comparing the groups in terms of compensation level (P=.08; Cohen w=0.19) and perceived burden (P=.09; Cohen d=-0.36). Qualitative findings revealed that EMA+DD participants perceived that seeing their progress facilitated engagement. Within the EMA+DD Group, providing a DD at the moment level did not significantly impact participants’ likelihood of completing the EMA or completion time at that particular prompt (all P>.05), with the exception of the first prompt of the day (P=.01 and P<.001). Conclusions: Providing a DD may be useful to increase engagement, particularly for researchers aiming to assess health behaviors shortly after a survey prompt is deployed to participants’ mobile devices. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/57664 SN - 2561-326X UR - https://formative.jmir.org/2024/1/e60193 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/60193 DO - 10.2196/60193 ID - info:doi/10.2196/60193 ER -