TY  - JOUR
AU  - Niu, Zheyu
AU  - Hao, Yijie
AU  - Yang, Faji
AU  - Jiang, Qirong
AU  - Jiang, Yupeng
AU  - Zhang, Shizhe
AU  - Song, Xie
AU  - Chang, Hong
AU  - Zhou, Xu
AU  - Zhu, Huaqiang
AU  - Gao, Hengjun
AU  - Lu, Jun
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/12/11
TI  - Quality of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Videos Available on TikTok and Bilibili: Content Analysis
JO  - JMIR Form Res
SP  - e60033
VL  - 8
KW  - pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
KW  - short videos
KW  - quality analysis
KW  - TikTok
KW  - Bilibili
KW  - social media
AB  - Background: Disseminating disease knowledge through concise videos on various platforms is an innovative and efficient approach. However, it remains uncertain whether pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET)-related videos available on current short video platforms can effectively convey accurate and impactful information to the general public. Objective: Our study aims to extensively analyze the quality of pNET-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili, intending to enhance the development of pNET-related social media content to provide the general public with more comprehensive and suitable avenues for accessing pNET-related information. Methods: A total of 168 qualifying videos pertaining to pNETs were evaluated from the video-sharing platforms Bilibili and TikTok. Initially, the fundamental information conveyed in the videos was documented. Subsequently, we discerned the source and content type of each video. Following that, the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) scale were employed to appraise the educational value and quality of each video. A comparative evaluation was conducted on the videos obtained from these two platforms. Results: The number of pNET-related videos saw a significant increase since 2020, with 9 videos in 2020, 19 videos in 2021, 29 videos in 2022, and 106 videos in 2023. There were no significant improvements in the mean GQS or mDISCERN scores from 2020 to 2023, which were 3.22 and 3.00 in 2020, 3.33 and 2.94 in 2021, 2.83 and 2.79 in 2022, and 2.78 and 2.94 in 2023, respectively. The average quality scores of the videos on Bilibili and Tiktok were comparable, with GQS and mDISCERN scores of 2.98 on Bilibili versus 2.77 on TikTok and 2.82 on Bilibili versus 3.05 on TikTok, respectively. The source and format of the videos remained independent factors affecting the two quality scores. Videos that were uploaded by professionals (hazard ratio=7.02, P=.002) and recorded in specialized popular science formats (hazard ratio=12.45, P<.001) tended to exhibit superior quality. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the number of short videos on pNETs has increased in recent years, but video quality has not improved significantly. This comprehensive analysis shows that the source and format of videos are independent factors affecting video quality, which provides potential measures for improving the quality of short videos. 
SN  - 2561-326X
UR  - https://formative.jmir.org/2024/1/e60033
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/60033
DO  - 10.2196/60033
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/60033
ER  -