TY  - JOUR
AU  - Al-Attar, Mariam
AU  - Assawamartbunlue, Kesmanee
AU  - Gandrup, Julie
AU  - van der Veer, Sabine N
AU  - Dixon, William G
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/10/28
TI  - Exploring the Potential of Electronic Patient-Generated Health Data for Evaluating Treatment Response to Intramuscular Steroids in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Case Series
JO  - JMIR Form Res
SP  - e55715
VL  - 8
KW  - patient-reported outcome measures
KW  - remote monitoring
KW  - patient-generated health data
KW  - mobile health
KW  - intramuscular steroid injections
KW  - rheumatoid arthritis
KW  - app
KW  - case series
KW  - symptom tracking
KW  - pain score
AB  - Background: Mobile health devices are increasingly available, presenting exciting opportunities to remotely collect high-frequency, electronic patient-generated health data (ePGHD). This novel data type may provide detailed insights into disease activity outside usual clinical settings. Assessing treatment responses, which can be hampered by the infrequency of appointments and recall bias, is a promising, novel application of ePGHD. Drugs with short treatment effects, such as intramuscular steroid injections, illustrate the challenge, as patients are unlikely to accurately recall treatment responses at follow-ups, which often occur several months later. Retrospective assessment means that responses may be over- or underestimated. High-frequency ePGHD, such as daily, app-collected, patient-reported symptoms between clinic appointments, may bridge this gap. However, the potential of ePGHD remains untapped due to the absence of established definitions for treatment response using ePGHD or established methodological approaches for analyzing this type of data. Objective: This study aims to explore the feasibility of evaluating treatment responses to intramuscular steroid therapy in a case series of patients with rheumatoid arthritis tracking daily symptoms using a smartphone app. Methods: We report a case series of patients who collected ePGHD through the REmote Monitoring Of Rheumatoid Arthritis (REMORA) smartphone app for daily remote symptom tracking. Symptoms were tracked on a 0-10 scale. We described the patients’ longitudinal pain scores before and after intramuscular steroid injections. The baseline pain score was calculated as the mean pain score in the 10 days prior to the injection. This was compared to the pain scores in the days following the injection. “Response” was defined as any improvement from the baseline score on the first day following the injection. The response end time was defined as the first date when the pain score exceeded the pre-steroid baseline. Results: We included 6 patients who, between them, received 9 steroid injections. Average pre-injection pain scores ranged from 3.3 to 9.3. Using our definitions, 7 injections demonstrated a response. Among the responders, the duration of response ranged from 1 to 54 days (median 9, IQR 7-41), average pain score improvement ranged from 0.1 to 5.3 (median 3.3, IQR 2.2-4.0), and maximum pain score improvement ranged from 0.1 to 7.0 (median 4.3, IQR 1.7 to 6.0). Conclusions: This case series demonstrates the feasibility of using ePGHD to evaluate treatment response and is an important exploratory step toward developing more robust methodological approaches for analysis of this novel data type. Issues highlighted by our analysis include the importance of accounting for one-off data points, varying response start times, and confounders such as other medications. Future analysis of ePGHD across a larger population is required to address issues highlighted by our analysis and to develop meaningful consensus definitions for treatment response in time-series data. 
SN  - 2561-326X
UR  - https://formative.jmir.org/2024/1/e55715
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/55715
DO  - 10.2196/55715
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/55715
ER  -