TY  - JOUR
AU  - Yoon, Sungwon
AU  - Tan, Chao Min
AU  - Phang, Jie Kie
AU  - Liu, Venice Xi
AU  - Tan, Wee Boon
AU  - Kwan, Yu Heng
AU  - Low, Lian Leng
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/4/4
TI  - Exploring the Implementation of Shared Decision-Making Involving Health Coaches for Diabetes and Hypertension Self-Management: Qualitative Study
JO  - JMIR Form Res
SP  - e51848
VL  - 8
KW  - decision-making
KW  - diabetes
KW  - health coach
KW  - health coaching
KW  - healthcare professional
KW  - hypertension
KW  - patient
KW  - patient-centered care
KW  - person-centered care
KW  - qualitative research
KW  - self-management
KW  - shared decision-making
AB  - Background: An emerging focus on person-centered care has prompted the need to understand how shared decision-making (SDM) and health coaching could support self-management of diabetes and hypertension. Objective: This study aims to explore preferences for the scope of involvement of health coaches and health care professionals (HCPs) in SDM and the factors that may influence optimal implementation of SDM from the perspectives of patients and HCPs. Methods: We conducted focus group discussions with 39 patients with diabetes and hypertension and 45 HCPs involved in their care. The main topics discussed included the roles of health coaches and HCPs in self-management, views toward health coaching and SDM, and factors that should be considered for optimal implementation of SDM that involves health coaches. All focus group discussions were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Participants agreed that the main responsibility of HCPs should be identifying the patient’s stage of change and medication education, while health coaches should focus on lifestyle education, monitoring, and motivational conversation. The health coach was seen to be more effective in engaging patients in lifestyle education and designing goal management plans as health coaches have more time available to spend with patients. The importance of a health coach’s personal attributes (eg, sufficient knowledge of both medical and psychosocial management of disease conditions) and credentials (eg, openness, patience, and empathy) was commonly emphasized. Participants viewed that addressing the following five elements would be necessary for the optimal implementation of SDM: (1) target population (newly diagnosed and less stable patients), (2) commitment of all stakeholders (discrepancy on targeted times and modality), (3) continuity of care (familiar faces), (4) philosophy of care (person-centered communication), and (5) faces of legitimacy (physician as the ultimate authority). Conclusions: The findings shed light on the appropriate roles of health coaches vis-à-vis HCPs in SDM as perceived by patients and HCPs. Findings from this study also contribute to the understanding of SDM on self-management strategies for patients with diabetes and hypertension and highlight potential opportunities for integrating health coaches into the routine care process. 
SN  - 2561-326X
UR  - https://formative.jmir.org/2024/1/e51848
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/51848
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38573763
DO  - 10.2196/51848
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/51848
ER  -