TY  - JOUR
AU  - O'Driscoll, Ciarán
AU  - Singh, Aneesha
AU  - Chichua, Iya
AU  - Clodic, Joachim
AU  - Desai, Anjali
AU  - Nikolova, Dara
AU  - Yap, Alex Jie
AU  - Zhou, Irene
AU  - Pilling, Stephen
PY  - 2024
DA  - 2024/3/20
TI  - An Ecological Mobile Momentary Intervention to Support Dynamic Goal Pursuit: Feasibility and Acceptability Study
JO  - JMIR Form Res
SP  - e49857
VL  - 8
KW  - goal pursuit
KW  - ecological momentary intervention
KW  - ecological momentary assessment
KW  - mood
KW  - dynamics
KW  - network analysis
KW  - MCII
KW  - COM-B
KW  - support
KW  - pilot study
KW  - training
KW  - feasibility
KW  - acceptability
KW  - self-monitoring
KW  - implementation
KW  - psychological
KW  - effectiveness
AB  - Background: Individuals can experience difficulties pursuing their goals amid multiple competing priorities in their environment. Effective goal dynamics require flexible and generalizable pursuit skills. Supporting successful goal pursuit requires a perpetually adapting intervention responsive to internal states. Objective: The purpose of this study was to (1) develop a flexible intervention that can adapt to an individual’s changing short to medium-term goals and be applied to their daily life and (2) examine the feasibility and acceptability of the just-in-time adaptive intervention for goal pursuit. Methods: This study involved 3 iterations to test and systematically enhance all aspects of the intervention. During the pilot phase, 73 participants engaged in an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) over 1 month. After week 1, they attended an intervention training session and received just-in-time intervention prompts during the following 3 weeks. The training employed the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior (COM-B) framework for goal setting, along with mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII). Subsequent prompts, triggered by variability in goal pursuit, guided the participants to engage in MCII in relation to their current goal. We evaluated feasibility and acceptability, efficacy, and individual change processes by combining intensive (single-case experimental design) and extensive methods. Results: The results suggest that the digital intervention was feasible and acceptable to participants. Compliance with the intervention was high (n=63, 86%). The participants endorsed high acceptability ratings relating to both the study procedures and the intervention. All participants (N=73, 100%) demonstrated significant improvements in goal pursuit with an average difference of 0.495 units in the outcome (P<.001). The results of the dynamic network modeling suggest that self-monitoring behavior (EMA) and implementing the MCII strategy may aid in goal reprioritization, where goal pursuit itself is a driver of further goal pursuit. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of a just-in-time adaptive intervention among a nonclinical adult sample. This intervention used self-monitoring of behavior, the COM-B framework, and MCII strategies to improve dynamic goal pursuit. It was delivered via an Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) procedure. Future research should consider the utility of this approach as an additional intervention element within psychological interventions to improve goal pursuit. Sustaining goal pursuit throughout interventions is central to their effectiveness and warrants further evaluation. 
SN  - 2561-326X
UR  - https://formative.jmir.org/2024/1/e49857
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/49857
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38506904
DO  - 10.2196/49857
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/49857
ER  -