TY  - JOUR
AU  - Guglani, Sheena
AU  - Liddy, Clare
AU  - Afkham, Amir
AU  - Mitchell, Rhea
AU  - Keely, Erin
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/4/22
TI  - The Ontario Electronic Consultation (eConsult) Service: Cross-sectional Analysis of Utilization Data for 2 Models
JO  - JMIR Form Res
SP  - e32101
VL  - 6
IS  - 4
KW  - eConsult
KW  - access to care
KW  - utilization
KW  - consultation
KW  - primary care provider
KW  - direct-to-specialist
KW  - Ontario
KW  - healthcare system
AB  - Background: The Ontario electronic consultation (eConsult) service allows a primary care provider (PCP) to access specialist advice through 2 models: the direct-to-specialist (DTS) model, where PCPs select a specialist from a directory, and the Building Access to Specialists Through eConsultation (BASE)–managed specialty service, where PCPs choose a specialty group and are assigned a specialist from a qualified pool based on availability. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine patterns of use between the 2 models of eConsult delivery. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of utilization data collected from eConsults completed between October 2018 and September 2019. Cases were grouped based on the model used for submission (ie, BASE or DTS). Each model was assessed for the number of cases over time, specialty distribution, proportion resulting in new or additional information, impact on PCPs’ decisions to refer, and billing time. Results: PCPs submitted 26,121 eConsults during the study period. The monthly case volume increased by 43% over the duration of the study, primarily in the BASE model (66% compared to 6% for DTS). PCPs were able to confirm a course of action that they originally had in mind in 41.4% (6373/15,376) of BASE cases and 41.3% (3363/8136) of DTS cases and received advice for a new or additional course of action in 54.7% (8418/15,376) of BASE cases and 56.3% (4582/8136) of DTS cases. A referral was originally contemplated but avoided in 51.3% (7887/15,376) of BASE cases and 53.3% (4336/8136) of DTS cases, originally contemplated and still needed in 19.4% (2986/15,376) of BASE cases and 17.7% (1438/8136) of DTS cases, and neither originally contemplated nor needed in 21.7% (3334/15,376) of BASE cases and 21.9% (1781/8136) of DTS cases. Conclusions: Both eConsult models had strong uptake. Use patterns varied between models, with the majority of growth occurring under BASE, but survey responses showed that both models provided similar outcomes in terms of new information offered and impact on decision to refer. 
SN  - 2561-326X
UR  - https://formative.jmir.org/2022/4/e32101
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/32101
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451985
DO  - 10.2196/32101
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/32101
ER  -