TY  - JOUR
AU  - Wright, Hayley
AU  - Turner, Andrew
AU  - Ennis, Stuart
AU  - Percy, Carol
AU  - Loftus, Garry
AU  - Clyne, Wendy
AU  - Matouskova, Gabriela
AU  - Martin, Faith
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/10/14
TI  - Digital Peer-Supported Self-Management Intervention Codesigned by People With Long COVID: Mixed Methods Proof-of-Concept Study
JO  - JMIR Form Res
SP  - e41410
VL  - 6
IS  - 10
KW  - long COVID
KW  - self-management
KW  - peer support
KW  - digital intervention
KW  - goal setting
KW  - psychological
KW  - physical
KW  - cognitive
KW  - intervention
KW  - United Kingdom
KW  - UK
KW  - efficacy
KW  - COVID-19
AB  - Background: There are around 1.3 million people in the United Kingdom with the devastating psychological, physical, and cognitive consequences of long COVID (LC). UK guidelines recommend that LC symptoms be managed pragmatically with holistic support for patients’ biopsychosocial needs, including psychological, emotional, and physical health. Self-management strategies, such as pacing, prioritization, and goal setting, are vital for the self-management of many LC symptoms. Objective: This paper describes the codevelopment and initial testing of a digital intervention combining peer support with positive psychology approaches for self-managing the physical, emotional, psychological, and cognitive challenges associated with LC. The objectives of this study were to (1) codesign an intervention with and for people with LC; (2) test the intervention and study methods; (3) measure changes in participant well-being, self-efficacy, fatigue, and loneliness; and (4) understand the types of self-management goals and strategies used by people with LC. Methods: The study used a pre-post, mixed methods, pragmatic, uncontrolled design. Digital intervention content was codeveloped with a lived-experience group to meet the needs uncovered during the intervention development and logic mapping phase. The resulting 8-week digital intervention, Hope Programme for Long COVID, was attended by 47 participants, who completed pre- and postprogram measures of well-being, self-efficacy, fatigue, and loneliness. Goal-setting data were extracted from the digital platform at the end of the intervention. Results: The recruitment rate (n=47, 83.9%) and follow-up rate (n=28, 59.6%) were encouraging. Positive mental well-being (mean difference 6.5, P<.001) and self-efficacy (mean difference 1.1, P=.009) improved from baseline to postcourse. All goals set by participants mapped onto the 5 goal-oriented domains in the taxonomy of everyday self-management strategies (TEDSS). The most frequent type of goals was related to activity strategies, followed by health behavior and internal strategies. Conclusions: The bespoke self-management intervention, Hope Programme for Long COVID, was well attended, and follow-up was encouraging. The sample characteristics largely mirrored those of the wider UK population with LC. Although not powered to detect statistically significant changes, the preliminary data show improvements in self-efficacy and positive mental well-being. Our next trial (ISRCTN: 11868601) will use a nonrandomized waitlist control design to further examine intervention efficacy. 
SN  - 2561-326X
UR  - https://formative.jmir.org/2022/10/e41410
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/41410
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36166651
DO  - 10.2196/41410
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/41410
ER  -