@Article{info:doi/10.2196/73778,
author="Meyer, Kylie
and Wei, Wenxing
and Yonashiro-Cho, Jeanine
and Mage, Susanna
and Kim, Sohee
and Irani, Elliane
and Burant, Christopher
and Gassoumis, Zachary
and Lamb, Erin Gentry
and Zauszniewski, Jaclene A
and Benton, Donna",
title="Acceptability of an Intervention to Prevent Older Adult Mistreatment Among Family Caregivers to Persons With Dementia: Multimethod Pilot Study",
journal="JMIR Form Res",
year="2025",
month="Jul",
day="30",
volume="9",
pages="e73778",
keywords="family caregiving; dementia; elder mistreatment; intervention; acceptability; qualitative",
abstract="Background: Older adult mistreatment occurs in many as one-half of dementia care partners. Psychological mistreatment is the most common form of older adult mistreatment by family caregivers and is known to create mental health morbidities among care recipients. The Knowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Enhanced Relationships (KINDER) intervention is among the first older adult mistreatment prevention interventions focused on family caregivers. KINDER was designed to prevent psychological mistreatment of older adults. Caregivers found the initial asynchronous web-based version (KINDER 1.0) to be acceptable but expressed a desire to engage with other family caregivers. KINDER was revised to integrate 3 facilitated small group discussion sessions conducted by videoconference. This study examines the acceptability of a revised KINDER intervention. This research addresses the extent to which caregivers find a novel approach to older adult mistreatment prevention to be acceptable. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the acceptability of the revised KINDER intervention. Methods: The investigators conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of family caregivers following participation in KINDER (N=11) and collected postintervention survey data (N=71). The qualitative interview codebook and survey questions were informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability by Sekhon et al. Components of acceptability in this framework include affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy at completing activities. Qualitative interviews were coded by 2 independent coders using a thematic analytic approach. Survey data were analyzed using frequencies and percentages. Results: Of the 98 caregivers who attended KINDER, 71 (72{\%}) completed satisfaction surveys. Caregivers reported high levels of overall satisfaction with KINDER; 80{\%} (53/66) of participants reported they were ``Very Satisfied'' with the intervention, and 20{\%} (13/66) indicated they were ``Satisfied.'' More than 80{\%} of caregivers (56/69, 81{\%}) rated the newly added group discussions as being ``Very valuable.'' Qualitative findings supported positive attitudes revealed in survey responses. Themes addressed (1) the interventions' alignment with caregiver values (affective attitude, intervention coherence, ethicality), (2) beliefs about the effectiveness of the program (perceived effectiveness), (3) difficulty participating in the program relative to its perceived overall value (burden, opportunity cost, self-efficacy), and (4) recommendations to further improve the intervention. Conclusions: These findings indicate that KINDER was well received among family caregivers, who reported high levels of satisfaction and positive feedback on its components. The addition of virtual group discussion sessions was particularly valued. The use of multiple data collection methods in this research provided a comprehensive understanding of caregiver experiences. This study contributes to current knowledge by demonstrating the acceptability of a novel intervention to prevent older adult mistreatment by family caregivers to persons with dementia. Future research should focus on testing the efficacy of KINDER and exploring its implementation in health and social service settings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05783102; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05783102 ",
issn="2561-326X",
doi="10.2196/73778",
url="https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e73778",
url="https://doi.org/10.2196/73778"
}