This study was a hospital-based retrospective study conducted at the Emergency and Poison Control Department of Thai Binh Pediatric Hospital, a provincial grade 1 pediatric specialty hospital in Thai Binh province. In July 2025, Thai Binh and Hung Yen provinces were merged into a single province named Hung Yen. Thai Binh Pediatric Hospital provides pediatric care to children from Thai Binh and neighboring areas. It also supports lower-level health facilities in pediatric care. The Emergency and Poison Control Department is a frontline 24-hour unit that receives and manages pediatric emergencies, including acute poisoning. It has facilities for monitoring, resuscitation, gastrointestinal decontamination, and selected antidotal treatment.

The study population included all children aged <16 years with a diagnosis of acute poisoning and treated at Thai Binh Pediatric Hospital from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2025. Case identification used the hospital’s electronic medical record system. A total of 326 records with an acute poisoning diagnosis were identified during the study period. After application of the eligibility criteria and exclusion of incomplete records, 276 children were included in the final analysis.

Children were eligible for inclusion if they were aged <16 years and had a diagnosis of acute poisoning. Acute poisoning was defined when at least two of the following three criteria were met: (1) documented evidence of toxic exposure, such as a witnessed ingestion or exposure, a history provided by the child or caregiver, physical evidence (eg, medication packages or opened chemical containers), characteristic odors, or evidence of bites or stings; (2) clinical manifestations consistent with acute poisoning, including sudden abnormal symptoms in a previously healthy child that could not be explained by another cause; and (3) toxicological testing showing a toxic substance in biological samples consistent with the clinical presentation. Patients with anaphylactic shock or other allergic reactions after drug use, chronic poisoning, or records considered insufficient for study abstraction were excluded from the study.

Data were abstracted from medical records using a structured case record form developed for the study. Variables included age, sex, exposure location, time from poisoning to hospital presentation, exposure intent, route of exposure, poisoning agent, recorded treatment measures, and in-hospital outcome. Exposure intent (intentional or unintentional) was abstracted from the treating clinician’s documentation, which incorporated the recorded circumstances of exposure and history obtained from the child and/or caregiver. If the documentation was insufficient to determine intent, the case was to be coded as uncertain; all included cases had a recorded classification. Because this classification depended on retrospective clinical documentation and family or child history, misclassification was possible, particularly when self-harm, neglect, or family circumstances were incompletely documented.

Regarding poisoning agents, food included spoiled or unhygienically prepared food, poisonous mushrooms, and food products or additives of unknown origin. Other medications included medications outside the prespecified medication groups, such as antiepileptic drugs, oral contraceptives, vitamin supplements, and traditional medicines. Other chemical substances included agents outside the prespecified chemical categories, such as mothballs, cajuput oil, 90% ethanol, petroleum jelly, gel ice packs, and mercury. Snakebite referred to snake envenomation, whereas insect stings or bites referred to bee stings. When more than one substance was documented, the agent category reflected the substance judged by the treating team to be responsible for the clinical toxidrome, and 2 such coexposure cases were recorded. The exposure route could include more than one route. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel for management and cleaning before analysis.

RStudio (Posit PBC) was used for statistical analysis. Only descriptive statistics were applied. Categorical variables were described using frequency and percentage, while continuous variables were summarized as mean and SD or median and IQR, as appropriate. No imputation was performed for missing data because the study did not estimate associations or model-based effects, and the analyses were limited to descriptive summaries. A formal test for missing completely at random was not performed because missing data were handled using transparent, variable-specific denominators rather than inferential modeling. The number of missing observations was also reported for each variable, where applicable.

This study was conducted using clinical information obtained from eligible pediatric patients treated at Thai Binh Pediatric Hospital during the study period. All collected patient information was kept strictly confidential and was used solely for research purposes. Personal identifiers were not disclosed in the study database, analysis, or reporting. This study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy (2240.35.C11; issued on November 11, 2025). Approval covered the retrospective review of medical records of children admitted from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2025. Case identification and research data extraction began in January 2026. No records were accessed or extracted for research purposes before approval. Individual informed consent was waived for this retrospective medical record review. Data were deidentified for analysis, and personal identifiers were not included in the analytic dataset or reports. No participant compensation was provided.

This study showed that acute poisoning was concentrated among children aged 1 to 5 years and most often occurred unintentionally at home. Ingestion was the main route of exposure. The agent profile was mixed, with chemical substances, medications, food, and venom-related exposures all represented. Treatment data are descriptive and should not be interpreted as evidence that specific procedures were appropriate or effective. Most children were discharged from the study hospital, while 7 were transferred to another hospital, and their final outcomes were unavailable.

The age distribution is consistent with recent evidence from Haiphong Children’s Hospital in Vietnam, where children aged 1 to 5 years also represented the largest group (65.6%) and most poisoning cases were unintentional (82.1%) [16]. However, the agent profile differed. In Haiphong, nonpharmaceutical chemicals (42.9%) and medications (37.6%) predominated, whereas the present dataset showed a more mixed pattern that also included substantial food and venom-related exposures. These differences suggest that pediatric poisoning profiles can vary between provincial settings and support locally tailored prevention rather than assuming that one national pattern applies uniformly.

The local agent pattern is therefore an important contribution of this study. Pesticides and rodenticides were present but did not dominate the recorded cases, while food-related poisoning and bee stings were comparatively prominent. This extends the available evidence from Vietnam by providing recent data from Thai Binh and by showing that household, food-related, environmental, medication, and envenomation exposures all contribute to the clinical workload. For local prevention, practical priorities include safer storage of medicines and household or agricultural chemicals, caregiver education for families with young children, and locally relevant messaging about food safety and venomous or stinging animals.

The age distribution of intentional poisoning is clinically important. In this cohort, all intentional poisonings occurred in children older than 10 years. This is consistent with the wider literature showing that intentional self-poisoning and substance-related toxic exposures are concentrated in adolescents, with psychosocial and mental health factors playing a substantial role [4,5,17,18]. This pattern indicates that poisoning prevention cannot rely on a single strategy across all age groups. For younger children, prevention should focus on supervision and safe storage. For older children and adolescents, screening for emotional distress, self-harm risk, and intentional ingestion becomes much more relevant.

The in-hospital outcome data require cautious interpretation. Most children were discharged from Thai Binh Pediatric Hospital, and there were no deaths at the study hospital. However, 7 children were transferred to a national hospital, and their subsequent outcomes were unavailable, so the cohort cannot be described as having uniformly favorable final outcomes. In addition, the retrospective records did not contain enough standardized information on poisoning severity or on the timing, indication, and complications of procedures such as gastric lavage, induced vomiting, activated charcoal, or cathartics to assess treatment appropriateness. The frequencies reported here should therefore be interpreted as patterns of recorded practice rather than evidence of successful management.

These findings have several practical implications. For young children, prevention should prioritize storing medicines, rodenticides, pesticides, cleaning products, and petroleum products in locked or otherwise inaccessible locations. Toxic products should also not be transferred into food or drink containers. The mixed agent profile also supports caregiver education on food safety and rapid recognition of snakebite or bee sting toxicity. For older children and adolescents, the concentration of intentional poisoning in those older than 10 years supports routine assessment of self-harm risk and psychosocial distress when intentional exposure is suspected. At the service level, standardized documentation of exposure intent, agent, timing, severity, treatment indication, and transfer outcome would improve both clinical continuity and future surveillance.

This study should be interpreted in light of several limitations. First, the retrospective design depended on the accuracy and completeness of medical records. Therefore, some variables may have been missing or misclassified. Second, this was a single-center hospital-based study; therefore, the findings may not fully represent the broader community burden of pediatric poisoning or other regions with different exposure patterns. Third, the study was descriptive and could not identify causal risk factors or predictors of poor outcome. Fourth, poisoning severity scores, complete toxicological confirmation, or detailed long-term follow-up were unavailable, which limits the interpretation of treatment appropriateness and the full clinical impact of poisoning. Finally, because there were no in-hospital deaths and relatively few severe outcomes, the study has limited ability to identify factors associated with mortality or critical illness.

Pediatric acute poisoning at this provincial hospital predominantly affected young children and usually occurred unintentionally in the home. The findings confirm the importance of early-childhood household exposures, as reported previously in Vietnam, while also showing a mixed local agent profile that includes chemical, medication, food-related, and venom-related exposures. Local prevention should emphasize secure storage, caregiver education, food and environmental safety, and age-appropriate assessment of intentional poisoning in older children. Most children were discharged from the study hospital, but final outcomes were unavailable for those who were transferred. Treatment frequencies should be interpreted descriptively rather than as evidence of treatment appropriateness or effectiveness.