This cross-sectional study was based on an anonymous, self-administered, web-based questionnaire survey conducted in Japan in July 2024. After obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board, participants were recruited through Macromill, Inc, a research panel company that maintains a nationwide panel of registered monitors, including a disease-specific panel of patients with chronic constipation. This study was conducted as a closed web-based survey, and members of the chronic constipation panel were invited through email using a consecutive convenience sampling method. The purpose and content of the study were explained on the survey screen, and only participants who provided consent were included in the survey. The participants were older adults aged 65 to 74 years who took constipation medications prescribed by medical institutions for at least 4 days per week, excluding those who used the medication on an as-needed basis. The reason for limiting the target age range from 65 to 74 years was to ensure the reliability of self-reported data in an online survey and to minimize the influence of severe cognitive decline and marked physical functional impairment, which are more common among adults aged 75 years and older.

Participants with restricted fluid intake, diet, or physical activity due to physician instructions were excluded because these medically prescribed restrictions might prevent actual behaviors from accurately reflecting usual lifestyle habits, thereby potentially confounding the assessment of lifestyle factors.

The constipation-related symptoms, stool consistency, treatment process factors, and lifestyle factors analyzed in this study are listed in Table 1. In this study, each variable was operationally defined based on the respondent’s self-reported assessment of the corresponding questionnaire item. Details of the questionnaire items are provided in Table S1 in Multimedia Appendix 1.

Descriptive statistics are presented as mean (SD) for continuous variables and as numbers and percentages for categorical variables. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for each constipation-related symptom. All variables were entered simultaneously into the model using the forced-entry method. This approach was used to estimate the independent association of each factor with each symptom after adjustment for the other covariates. In the multivariable analysis, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated. The overall performance of the multivariable logistic regression models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. To account for the increased risk of type I error associated with multiple exploratory outcome analyses, a multiplicity adjustment was applied. P values were corrected using the Benjamini-Hochberg method to control the false discovery rate (FDR). Given that this study is exploratory in nature, this approach was determined to be more appropriate than a stricter family-wise error correction, as it helps suppress false-positive findings while reducing the risk of overlooking potentially relevant factors. Statistical significance was defined as an adjusted P value of less than .05. IBM SPSS Statistics version 30.0 and R version 4.6 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) were used for statistical analysis. However, outcomes with a low number of events were excluded from the multivariable analysis because they might not meet the required event count for multivariable logistic regression analysis.

As a supplementary analysis, we evaluated the associations between symptoms and each explanatory variable using univariate analysis. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables, and the two-tailed t test was used for continuous variables assuming a normal distribution. All analyses were conducted using the same cohort of participants (N=546), and separate multiple regression models were constructed for each constipation-related symptom. No a priori sample size calculation was performed, and all available data were included. A post hoc assessment using G*Power version 3.1.9.7 (Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf) indicated that the sample size was sufficient for the planned analyses.

This study was conducted in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hokkaido University of Science (approval number 24‐06). All participants voluntarily and anonymously completed the survey and were informed in advance that the submission of their responses would be considered consent to participate. Participants received written explanations prior to participation, and consent was confirmed by submitting responses to the online survey. All data were collected anonymously through an online survey, and no personally identifiable information was obtained. Appropriate measures were taken to ensure data privacy and confidentiality throughout the study. Participants received compensation through the survey panel provider in accordance with its standard incentive policy.

Of the 824 panel members invited to participate in the survey, 554 responded. After excluding 8 cases in which the type of laxative could not be identified, 546 subjects were analyzed. The mean age of participants was 69.4 (SD 2.9) years, and 66.8% (365/546) were men. The prescribing department for laxatives was gastroenterology/coloproctology in 24.5% (134/546) of cases. Side effects of laxatives were experienced by 22.2% (121/546) of patients, and hard stools were reported by 23.1% (126/546) of patients. Among the participants, 41.4% (226/546) had less than 3 spontaneous bowel movements per week, 60.4% (330/546) experienced straining during bowel movements, 63.0% (344/546) experienced a sensation of incomplete evacuation, and 44.3% (242/546) reported a sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage. In total, 6.4% (35/546) of patients required maneuvers to facilitate their bowel movements. Detailed background information on the participants is provided in Table 2.

In the univariate analysis, the group with less than 3 spontaneous bowel movements per week showed significantly higher proportions of women, those with adverse effects and hard stools, as well as significantly lower levels of physical activity, dietary fiber intake, and daily fluid intake. Straining during bowel movements was significantly more common in the hard-stool group and was significantly associated with lower levels of shared treatment goals and daily fluid intake. The sensation of incomplete evacuation was more common among those who experienced adverse effects in the hard-stool group and among stimulant laxative users. The sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage was significantly more frequent in the hard-stool group, among those who experienced adverse effects, and in the group with low adherence to the prescribed dose (Tables S2A-S2E in Multimedia Appendix 1).

Multivariable analysis revealed that each constipation-related symptom had a distinct set of factors that remained significantly associated after adjustment for other variables (Tables 3-6).

Having less than 3 spontaneous bowel movements per week was significantly associated with hard stool (BSFS type 1‐2; OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.40‐3.30) and the experience of adverse effects from constipation medications (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.30‐3.07). Furthermore, women were significantly associated with the outcome, with higher odds than men (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.27‐2.78). In contrast, higher levels of physical activity were significantly associated with a lower likelihood of having less than 3 spontaneous bowel movements per week (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77‐0.96) and were identified as an independent factor associated with less than 3 spontaneous bowel movements per week.

Straining during bowel movements was most strongly associated with hard stool (OR 4.66, 95% CI 2.74‐7.92), whereas female sex was associated with lower odds of straining (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34‐0.77). Higher daily fluid intake was also associated with lower odds of straining during bowel movements in the multivariable-adjusted model (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77‐1.00); however, this association did not remain significant after FDR adjustment (q=.19). The experience of adverse effects from constipation medications was not statistically significantly associated with straining during bowel movements, although the point estimate suggested a possible positive association (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.94‐2.35; q=.09).

Regarding the sensation of incomplete evacuation, hard stool (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.18‐2.92) and stimulant laxative use (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.22‐3.31) were significantly associated with higher odds of incomplete evacuation. In contrast, greater shared treatment goals were associated with lower odds (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73‐0.99), although this association did not remain significant after FDR adjustment (q=.16). The experience of adverse effects was not statistically significantly associated with the sensation of incomplete evacuation, although the point estimate suggested a possible positive association (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.99‐2.46; q=.07).

Finally, regarding the sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage, hard stool (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.78‐4.20) and the experience of adverse effects from laxatives (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.10‐2.59) were significantly associated factors. In contrast, adherence to the prescribed dosage was significantly and inversely associated with the sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78‐0.97). While female sex was associated with lower odds than male sex (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44‐0.98), this association, however, did not reach statistical significance after FDR adjustment (q=.053).

Manual maneuvers to facilitate defecation were excluded from the multivariable analysis because of the low number of events.

All models showed moderate discriminative ability, with AUC values ranging from 0.647 to 0.708. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated no significant lack of fit for the models of low defecation frequency, sensation of incomplete evacuation, and anorectal obstruction. In contrast, the straining model showed a significant result (P=.02), with an AUC of 0.708. In a sensitivity analysis using reversed outcome coding, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for the straining model became nonsignificant (P=.17).

This study examined factors associated with individual chronic constipation-related symptoms in adults aged 65 to 74 years with chronic constipation who were receiving pharmacological treatment, using a cross-sectional web-based survey. The findings suggest that these symptoms are not explained by a single underlying factor. Hard stool emerged as a primary factor associated with multiple symptoms, whereas treatment process elements and lifestyle factors contributed to symptom-specific variations. Overall, the clinical interpretation of chronic constipation in this population should take into account both shared and symptom-specific associated factors, rather than relying solely on isolated statistical associations.

Although hard stools are clinically classified as constipation-related symptoms, they were treated in this study as a stool-related characteristic reflecting defecation status. Hard stool (BSFS type 1‐2) was associated with the frequency of spontaneous bowel movements and subjective symptoms, such as straining during bowel movements, the sensation of incomplete evacuation, and the sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage.

Notably, the strength of these associations differed across symptoms. Hard stool was more strongly associated with straining during bowel movements than with the sensation of incomplete evacuation. This difference may reflect underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Straining is primarily related to increased resistance during stool expulsion and is therefore highly dependent on stool consistency [25,26]. Hard stool, reflecting prolonged intestinal transit time [2], may increase mechanical resistance during defecation, thereby resulting in a stronger association with straining. In contrast, the sensation of incomplete evacuation is not solely determined by stool characteristics but is also related to rectal sensory function and symptom perception. Previous studies have suggested that this sensation does not always correspond to objective physiological measures, such as colonic transit time or anorectal function [25-30], which may explain the relatively weaker association observed in this study.

In older adults, age-related factors such as reduced food intake and polypharmacy have been reported to contribute to stool hardening by prolonging intestinal transit time and altering intestinal motility [2]. Hard stool formation may contribute to difficulty in defecation or fecal impaction in the rectum [5,11]. These findings support the use of standardized measures, such as the BSFS, to evaluate stool consistency as a clinically relevant therapeutic target.

Here, adverse effects were associated with the frequency of spontaneous bowel movements and the sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage. These associations may be clinically meaningful because the frequency of spontaneous bowel movements is susceptible to the effects of drug therapy and is known to fluctuate rapidly due to the discontinuation of medication or self-adjustment [31]. Additionally, the sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage reflects instability during evacuation. If the effects of drug therapy are inconsistent, symptoms may persist [25,27]. Conversely, the absence of clear associations between adverse effects and straining during bowel movements or the sensation of incomplete evacuation may suggest that these symptoms are influenced more strongly by defecatory mechanisms. These symptoms are primarily attributable to defecatory disorders, such as pelvic floor dysfunction [25,27], and are therefore more likely to be influenced by the defecatory mechanism itself rather than by the consistency of drug efficacy. This may reflect the inclusion of patients for whom pharmacological treatment alone was insufficient. The relationship between symptoms and adverse effects may be confounded by other treatment process factors, such as daily fluid intake and shared treatment goals, which may independently influence symptoms such as straining and incomplete evacuation.

Among the lifestyle factors examined, physical activity emerged as a factor associated with spontaneous bowel movement frequency. Constipation characterized by reduced bowel movement frequency primarily involves prolonged colonic transit time and decreased intestinal motility [11,25,28]. Previous studies targeting physically inactive middle-aged patients with chronic constipation have suggested that exercise interventions are associated with intestinal motility and colonic transit time. However, consistent results regarding bowel movement frequency have not yet been obtained [32].

The observed association may indicate the clinical relevance of physical activity in relation to bowel movement frequency in older adults. Future research should clarify the role of nonpharmacological therapies through evaluations that consider both physical activity levels and functional capacity.

Daily fluid intake was associated with reduced straining during defecation before FDR correction; however, this association was not significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Straining during defecation results from increased resistance to stool passage and is known to be strongly influenced by stool consistency [25,26]. Previous studies have reported that insufficient fluid intake contributes to stool hardening [29]. The findings suggest a possible association between daily fluid intake and straining during defecation through its influence on stool consistency. However, this interpretation warrants caution because the association did not remain significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Although the statistical evidence was limited, the assessment of daily fluid intake may still be clinically useful when evaluating straining during defecation.

Although the observed association should be interpreted cautiously because it did not remain significant after correction for multiple testing, it may still provide insight into how patients perceive constipation-related symptoms. Studies involving patients with severe chronic constipation have reported that subjective symptoms, such as a sense of incomplete evacuation, do not necessarily correspond to objective physiological markers, including colonic transit time and anorectal function [28,30]. This discrepancy suggests that subjective symptom perception may be influenced by physiological dysfunction and by patients’ expectations and their understanding of the treatment. Therefore, while the associations observed in this study are exploratory, sharing treatment goals may be associated with how patients perceive a sense of incomplete evacuation. When evaluating and managing a sense of incomplete evacuation, an assessment framework that incorporates both patient-reported perceptions—including their understanding of treatment goals—and underlying pathophysiology may be clinically useful.

The observed association between the sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage and adherence to the prescribed dosage suggests that the stability of drug efficacy may play a role in modulating defecatory symptoms. Anorectal obstruction or blockage is reported to be related to the instability of anorectal function and bowel movements [11,28]. Adherence to the prescribed dosage may be associated with the stability of drug efficacy, thereby potentially modulating symptoms. However, the experience of adverse effects frequently results in medication discontinuation, which may subsequently disrupt bowel habits and influence symptoms. The observed relationship between adherence to the prescribed regimen and symptoms suggests that consistent medication use may help regulate the defecation process and may therefore be associated with a reduced sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage. Accordingly, a comprehensive evaluation of this sensation should include the assessment of medication adherence, stool consistency, and patient-reported symptoms.

The observed sex-specific patterns in symptom presentation suggest potential differences in the relative contributions of colonic transit versus evacuation processes.

The higher likelihood of reduced bowel movement frequency in women may be related to slower colonic transit. Age-related changes, including degeneration of colonic smooth muscle and increased collagen deposition, have been reported to reduce high-amplitude propagating contractions, which may prolong colonic transit time [8]. Such mechanisms may contribute to the higher prevalence of reduced bowel movement frequency in older women.

In contrast, the lower likelihood of straining and anorectal obstruction or blockage in women suggests that men may be more likely to report symptoms related to evacuation difficulty. This pattern may reflect differences in symptom generation and reporting rather than differences in physiological sensitivity alone. While women are generally considered to be at higher risk of structural pelvic floor abnormalities, such as rectocele [33], the present findings in a pharmacologically treated population suggest that symptom expression differs, with women more likely to exhibit delayed transit features and men more likely to report outlet-related symptoms.

The findings of this study should be interpreted with caution in light of several limitations. First, due to the cross-sectional design, temporal relationships between the examined factors and constipation symptoms could not be established; therefore, the observed associations should not be interpreted as causal. Second, this study used a web-based survey with participants recruited from an online research panel, which may introduce selection bias. In addition, the study population was restricted to individuals aged 65 to 74 years who were able to complete an online questionnaire. These factors may limit the representativeness of the sample and reduce the generalizability of the findings to older adults (≥75 y), individuals with cognitive impairment, or those without internet access. Third, key variables—including symptoms, lifestyle factors, treatment goal sharing, medication adherence, and adverse effects—were assessed using self-reported measures. This may introduce measurement error, recall bias, and reporting bias and could result in residual confounding. Moreover, some survey items were developed based on theoretical considerations and expert review, but lack formal reliability and validity data beyond content validation, and were not fully validated against established instruments or objective indicators. In addition, adverse effects were assessed without detailed information on symptom types or severity. Finally, objective physiological indicators, such as colonic transit time and pelvic floor function, were not evaluated, and these unmeasured factors may have influenced the observed associations. Future studies using longitudinal designs, validated multi-item instruments, and objective clinical measures are warranted to confirm the robustness of these findings.

Despite these limitations, the clinical significance of this study lies in the use of self-reported patient data. These findings suggest that the symptoms of chronic constipation may involve multifactorial contributors that cannot be explained by a single mechanism. Rather, multiple factors, including defecatory function, lifestyle habits, and treatment-related processes, contribute differentially to each symptom. In the future, symptom-specific assessments using electronic patient-reported outcomes may provide a basis for more targeted and individualized management strategies in older adults.

This study demonstrated that in older adults with chronic constipation, less than 3 spontaneous bowel movements per week, straining during bowel movements, a sensation of incomplete evacuation, and a sensation of anorectal obstruction or blockage were each associated with distinct factors. Hard stool is a key factor common to both objective and subjective symptoms, suggesting the importance of focusing on stool consistency as a central element in evaluating constipation.

Additionally, although some associations were not significant after correction for multiple comparisons, symptom-specific associations were observed. These findings suggest that uniform, one-size-fits-all approaches to symptom management may be insufficient in older adults with chronic constipation. Instead, symptom management may benefit from a more symptom-oriented approach that considers underlying pathophysiology, lifestyle factors, and treatment processes.

From a digital health perspective, these results support the use of electronically collected patient-reported outcomes to enable continuous, scalable, and individualized assessment of constipation symptoms. Such approaches may facilitate more targeted and personalized management strategies in real-world clinical settings.