This pilot investigation used an electronic voluntary survey administered to second- and third-year medical students at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia during their EM clerkship at a large, urban academic institution. The study was approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board (849318). All research methods, consent, and activities were performed in accordance with the university guidelines and regulations.

Inclusion criteria consisted of students in their second (preclerkship or M2) or third (clerkship or M3) year of medical school. This study was cross-sectional, and a voluntary response sample was used. There were no specific exclusion criteria, as other students were not invited to the survey.

Participants were invited via email, completed informed consent, and were not compensated for participating. Data were collected and aggregated for analysis. The students at this medical school are routinely surveyed, and questions from this study were incorporated into the preexisting and ongoing school surveying. In total, the survey was sent to 161 students in their preclerckship (M2) and 153 students in their clerckship (M3) during the final week of classes in December 2021.

This cross-sectional pilot study was developed by the research team, with expertise in medical education (authors ST and DA), qualitative methods (AKA and RG), and clinician well-being (AKA). No previous instrument, to the knowledge of the study team, exists; thus, the instrument was developed and pilot-tested in this study. All answers were anonymous, and no demographic information was collected. The primary outcome of interest was student-reported preparedness and comfort in handling trauma and critical care patient encounters. Secondary outcomes included awareness of well-being resources available to them during their clerkship, feelings of preparedness, and comfort in accessing well-being resources. Comparisons were done using chi-square tests in Stata IC 16.1 (StataCorp), and a P<.05 was considered statistically significant.

Given EM’s high rates of burnout and the vulnerable role medical students hold as trainees, medical students undergoing their EM clerkship are at high risk of emotional strain and stress [15]. The rising focus on physician mental health extends to those in training [8]. There is a gap in understanding how prepared medical students feel in identifying and addressing their emotional response and the impact experiences in EM may have upon them. This study assessed medical students’ preparation to better understand their needs and guide interventions toward key priority areas of focus.

This study found that, regardless of whether students had already witnessed the care of a critically ill patient, most students did not feel prepared to identify or address the emotional impact associated with these situations. This highlights the need to train students early and normalize the emotional impact of working in medicine [19,20]. The stigma associated with mental health in health care has pervaded the classroom and hospitals, and to build structures to prevent burnout, we must begin early to help trainees identify feelings of anxiety, depression, or stress as they experience them [13,21-23]. A proactive approach would provide students with the tools and resources they need to adequately identify their emotions and connect to appropriate resources when needed.

It is essential for institutions not only to have resources available to support students’ well-being and mental health but also to make these resources readily accessible and easy to navigate. Our findings reveal that even in an environment where resources are present, students may be unaware of these resources or may not be comfortable accessing them. The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine has a robust infrastructure within the medical school, a separate web-based mental health and well-being platform, accessible to the entire health system community [24]. However, students in this study remained unaware of their availability or accessibility. Institutions must work to incorporate these resources into the clinical and teaching environments to reduce the stigma that may prevent students from accessing them.

Finally, the significant differences in feelings of preparedness between those students who had and those who had not witnessed the care of critical care patients suggest that students do not feel prepared to identify the emotional impact such experience may have until it has happened. It is important to act proactively to prepare students to experience the care of critical patients. EM provides an ideal environment to do so, as the likelihood that students will be placed in an emotionally charged setting is high [17,25]. Venues such as critical care, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, as well as surgery provide other opportune areas for schools to think about deploying focused interventions to where students may need them most.

This study has some limitations. First, to protect confidentiality and privacy, we did not collect demographic information. This prevented us from analyzing how these findings might differ by age, race, or ethnicity. Second, as medical students self-selected to participate, selection bias may play a role. The participants surveyed here may not accurately represent the experiences of all medical students in the clerkship program. Additionally, this study was performed at a single urban, academic program and may not be applicable to all medical students at other various institutions. We are also limited by a sample of 56 students, which may further limit our ability to generalize these findings.

Similar to other roles in health care, medical students do not feel fully prepared to identify or address the emotional impact of working in acute care. Additionally, they lack awareness of or comfort with accessing institutional resources designed to support their well-being. Medical students who have not witnessed the care of a critically ill or injured patient were more likely to feel unprepared in identifying or addressing the emotional impact such an event might have on them. These findings can help inform and guide interventions by educational and academic leaders. The aim would be to create and promote training environments that empower students with tools to identify their own emotions and connect to well-being resources. We need to normalize the conversation around mental health in the health care workforce and reduce stigma early in medicine, beginning with our medical students.